Cited by 40Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBirth, Development, and Health

Abnormal fasting, post-load or combined glucose values on oral glucose tolerance test and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Papachatzopoulou, Eftychia, Chatzakis, Christos, Lambrinoudaki, Irene, Panoulis, Konstantinos, Dinas, Konstantinos, Vlahos, Nikolaos, Sotiriadis, Alexandros, Eleftheriades, Makarios·2020·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) present differences in the outcomes according to the findings on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), including fasting, post-load or combined abnormal blood glucose. Materials This was a prospective cohort study including 831 singleton pregnancies with GDM per the IADPSG criteria. According to their fasting blood glucose value on OGTT the women were categorized in three groups: (i) GDM women with fasting plasma glucose levels > 92 mg/dl and normal post-load values (T0 abnormal group), (ii) patients with abnormal values at 60' and/or 120' and normal fasting values (T-post group) and (iii) patients with combined fasting and post-load abnormal blood glucose values (T-comb). Regression analysis was used to test the independent contribution of the different groups, along with maternal and fetal characteristics, in prediction of (i) large for gestational age (LGA), (ii) need for insulin treatment and (iii) birthweight centile. Results GDM with abnormal fasting blood glucose was an independent risk factor for LGA (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.33-6.36) and was associated with higher birthweight centile (10.25, 95% CI 0.27-20.25). GDM with combined fasting and post-load abnormal blood glucose was an independent risk factor for insulin treatment (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.93-4.47). Conclusions Women with GDM and abnormal fasting blood glucose are at increased risk for large for gestational age neonates, while women with GDM and combined fasting and post-load abnormal blood glucose are at increased risk for insulin therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108048

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papachatzopoulou, E., Chatzakis, C., Lambrinoudaki, I., Panoulis, K., Dinas, K., Vlahos, N., Sotiriadis, A., & Eleftheriades, M.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Eleftheriades, Makarios
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
161
Pages
108048
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005310045
Cited by
40
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, fasting blood glucose, post-load glucose, abnormal blood glucose, large for gestational age, birthweight centiles, insulin therapy, pregnancy outcomes, IADPSG criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review