Cited by 5Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsRobot Manipulation and LearningWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses

Load cell torques and force data collection during tele-operated robotic gas tungsten arc welding in presence of collisions

Open access
Tannous, Michael, Bologna, Francesco, Stefanini, Cesare·2020·Data in Brief

Abstract

Torque and force signals data were acquired from a load-cell sensor during a robotic welding process, in presence of collisions between the tool and the workpiece edges outlined in part in "Haptic-based touch detection for collaborative robots in welding applications" [1]. The dataset is composed from 15 tests captured during a tele-operated welding robot performing a 1G ASME/AWS (i.e., PA ISO) welding process. The raw data files have been provided. These data can be used to correlate torque signal features with collision events, to improve algorithms of collision detection/avoidance and to develop reliable real-time haptic feedback to the welder. This dataset can also be used to study the torque signal variation in different welding positions (e.g., 2G, 3G, 2F, etc.). Dataset is provided as raw data and in MATLAB files.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105981

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contamination level of the dataset influences the performance of the algorithm.

    “Results confirmed the influence of the contamination level related to the dataset.”

    From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Data description section (page unavailable) describes raw welding measurements and collision labels, while Value of the data says the dataset could be used to develop algorithms. Neither reports algorithm-performance results or addresses dataset contamination levels (searched: contamination level, outliers, noise, algorithm performance). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 3-Sigma rule achieved better performance than the Hampel identifier in precision percentage (mean 99.9%) and miss rate (mean 10%).

    “Experimental results showed better performance of the 3-Sigma rule in terms of precision percentage (mean value of 99.9%) and miss rate (mean value of 10%) concerning the Hampel identifier.”

    From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Data description presents a raw dataset from 15 welding tests, and Value of the data says it could be used to develop collision-detection algorithms. Neither section reports a comparison of the 3-Sigma rule with the Hampel identifier. Searches for those methods and for the stated 99.9% precision and 10% miss rate found no matching results in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tannous, M., Bologna, F., & Stefanini, C.
Affiliations
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Tannous, Michael
  • Bologna, Francesco
Venue
Data in Brief
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
31
Pages
105981
ISSN
2352-3409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004736846
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data in Brief (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
  • Regione Toscana
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Keywords
teleoperation, collision detection, collision avoidance, torque signals, force signals, load cell sensor, haptic feedback, collaborative robots, welding position

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review