The gig economy in Chile: Examining labor conditions and the nature of gig work in a Global South country
Abstract
While there is growing literature regarding the impact of the gig economy in countries of the Global North, the way it operates in Latin America and the Caribbean remains underexplored. This article describes platform work in Chile, especially in the context of COVID-19, which has highlighted the essential role of geographically tethered digital platforms in facilitating essential goods and services in times of social distancing and quarantine. While the gig economy has provided employment for those outside traditional labor markets, its supposedly ‘collaborative’ employment structures obscure the different costs of precarity and informality transferred from platforms to workers (Ravenelle, 2019). Based on 35 interviews with gig workers using the Fairwork framework to evaluate working conditions in the gig economy, this article examines digital labor relations, both on paper and in reality; the conditions and limitations gig workers face daily; and their perceptions regarding such platforms. We discuss the contradictory experiences felt by platform workers, dependent on the platform in some ways, and independent in others. We argue that the inherently contradictory conditions and circumstances of platform work have become even more salient for gig workers in the context of COVID-19: risks increasingly fall on workers as platforms continue to stress their ‘choice’ to do so. This article reveals that the nature of the linkage between platform and worker is eminently a labor rel…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chileans mainly work in transportation apps, while migrants dominate food delivery due to the need for a driver's license and vehicle ownership.
“Chileans mainly work in transportation apps, while migrants dom inate food delivery due to the need for a driver's license and vehicle ownership (Arriagada et al. 2023).”
From Racism and food delivery platforms: shaping migrants' work experiences and future expectations in the United Kingdom and Chile (2025) · cites this paper as Arriagada et al. 2023
Cites
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The winners and the losers of the platform economy: who participates?
Hoang, L., Blank, G., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1720771 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonhomme, M., & Muldoon, J. (2025) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2349268 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Chileans mainly work in transportation apps, while migrants dominate food delivery due to the need for a driver’s license and vehicle ownership (Arriagada et al. 2023).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Arriagada, A., Bonhomme, M., Ibáñez, F., & Leyton, J.
- Venue
- Digital Geography and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 100063
- ISSN
- 2666-3783
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Licence
- Funders
- ANID
- University of Cape Town (Anid/Fondecyt/Postdoctorado/3220193, NCS2021-033, NUDOS-Ncs2022_046)
- Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (Anid/Fondap/15130009)
- Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
- International Development Research Centre
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review