The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Avoiding squares and overlaps over the natural numbers
Open accessAbstract
We consider avoiding squares and overlaps over the natural numbers, using a greedy algorithm that chooses the least possible integer at each step; the word generated is lexicographically least among all such infinite words. In the case of avoiding squares, the word is 01020103..., the familiar ruler function, and is generated by iterating a uniform morphism. The case of overlaps is more challenging. We give an explicitly-defined morphism @f:N^*->N^* that generates the lexicographically least infinite overlap-free word by iteration. Furthermore, we show that for all h,[email protected]?N with [email protected]?k, the word @f^k^-^h(h) is the lexicographically least overlap-free word starting with the letter h and ending with the letter k, and give some of its symmetry properties.
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
The paper studies greedy no-backtracking generation of lexicographically least infinite words over \(\mathbb N\) avoiding squares and overlaps. It identifies the squarefree case as the ruler sequence generated by a simple morphism, and constructs an explicit overlap-free morphism whose fixed point is the lexicographically least overlap-free word, with length, frequency, and symmetry properties.
Key findings
- For squares, the lexicographically least infinite squarefree word over \(\mathbb N\) is \(w_2=01020103\cdots\), the ruler sequence (Sloane A007814), equal to \(\gamma^\omega(0)\) for \(\gamma(i)=0\cdot(i+1)\); \(w_2[i]=\nu_2(i)\), the exponent of the highest power of 2 dividing \(i\).
- For overlaps, the lexicographically least infinite overlap-free word is \(w_{2^+}=\varphi^\omega(0)\), where \(\varphi(0)=001\), \(\varphi(1)=1001002\), \(\varphi(2)=200100110010020010011001003\ldots\); the morphism \(\varphi\) is overlap-free and irreducible.
- For all \(0\le h\le k\), the lexicographically least overlap-free word starting with \(h\) and ending with \(k\) is \(\psi(h,k)=\varphi^{k-h}(h)\). Lengths include \(a(0,k)=1,3,13,79,633,6331\) for \(k=0,\dots,5\), and \(|\varphi(h)|=3,7,27,159,1267,\ldots\), with \(|\varphi(h)|=a(h,h+1)=2a(0,h)+1\).
- The letter \(k\) occurs in \(w_{2^+}\) with limiting frequency \(1/(2^k k!\sqrt e)\); symmetry results include \(S^{-1}(\psi(0,k))=R(\psi(0,k))\), \(\psi(0,k)\cdot k^{-1}\) is a palindrome, and \(\varphi\) commutes with its reversed morphism.
Methods
- Theoretical combinatorics on words: defines a no-backtracking greedy algorithm over \(\mathbb N\) and the notions of irreducibility of words and morphisms with respect to a pattern.
- No empirical data or sample; the work constructs morphisms \(\gamma\) and \(\varphi_h/\varphi\) and proves properties by induction, using a left inverse \(\rho\) for \(\gamma\) and block decompositions for \(\varphi_h\).
- Main analysis proves squarefree/overlap-free and irreducible properties, derives recurrences for lengths \(a(h,k)\) and letter counts \(d(h,k)=2^{k-h}k!/h!\), and establishes limiting letter frequencies.
Limitations
- Stated: fractional powers are harder; it is not even clear that an infinite alphabet is needed, and the first million letters of \(w_{5/2}\), the lexicographically least infinite word over \(\mathbb N\) avoiding all powers with exponent \(\ge 5/2\), are all in \(\{0,1,2\}\).
- Stated: the proofs are presented for squares and overlaps, though they can be extended to arbitrary \(n\)th powers and \((n+)\)-powers; for finite alphabet \(\Sigma_3\), it is not known whether the number of positions one has to backtrack is bounded.
- Evident from the text: the main overlap result is over the infinite alphabet \(\mathbb N\) and relies on the no-backtracking algorithm, so finite-alphabet analogues and backtracking complexity are not settled here.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 4 Not valid · 4 Not checked · 32 Own results and interpretations
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence γ is a squarefree morphism.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For all h ∈ N , ϕ h is an overlap-free morphism.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any finite squarefree word w over N can be extended to a longer squarefree word by appending a letter that does not appear in w”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and each one is preceded by a 0.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“if an infinite word w is P -free and irreducible, then it is the lexicographically least infinite P -free word”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
19 more claims
Create a free account to see all 40 claims and to verify the 5 references still open.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 7
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In 2009, Guay-Paquet and Shallit [4] established the structure of the lexicographically least square-free infinite word on the alphabet N := { 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . } . This word's letters comprise the ruler sequence 0102010301020104 · · · [9, A007814], and it is the fixed point ρ ∞ (0) of the ruler morphism ρ defined by ρ ( n ) = 0 ( n +1).”
From The Lexicographically Least Square-Free Word with a Given Prefix (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“More generally, for an integer a ≥ 2 we have w a = ϕ ∞ (0), where ϕ ( n ) = 0 a -1 ( n + 1).”
From Avoiding Fractional Powers over the Natural Numbers (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“GuayPaquet and Shallit [6] showed that the lexicographically least square-free word on Z ≥ 0 is”
From Avoiding Fractional Powers over the Natural Numbers (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“As shown in [4], this corresponds to running a backtracking algorithm without actually doing any backtracking; whenever a choice for the next symbol fails, we increment the choice by 1 until a valid choice is found.”
From Avoiding 3/2-powers over the natural numbers (2012) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
Sloane, N. J. A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73086-6_12 · Cited by 3,225
Automatic sequences theory, applications, generalizations
Allouche, J., & Shallit, J. O. (2003) · Cited by 851
Self-citationGolomb, S. W., & Baumert, L. D. (1965) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321296.321300 · Cited by 498
The ring of k-regular sequences, II
Allouche, J., & Shallit, J. O. (2003) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(03)00090-2 · Cited by 218
Self-citationThe ring of k-regular sequences
Allouche, J.-P., & Shallit, J. (1992) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90001-v · Cited by 163
Self-citationAxel Thue's papers on repetitions in words: a translation
Jean Berstel, A. (1992) · HAL · Cited by 111
Substitution dynamical systems on infinite alphabets
Ferenczi, S. (2006) · Annales de l’institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.2242 · Cited by 28
Propriétés arithmétiques des substitutions et automates infinis
Mauduit, C. (2006) · Annales de l’institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.2248 · Cited by 16
The Towers of Hanoi and Binary Numerals
Er, M. C. (1985) · Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences · doi:10.1080/02522667.1985.10698816 · Cited by 8
Sur la complexité de mots infinis engendrés par des q -automates dénombrables
Gonidec, M. L. (2006) · Annales de l’institut Fourier · doi:10.5802/aif.2246 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Thue, 1906, Über unendliche Zeichenreihen, Norske vid. Selsk. Skr. Mat. Nat. Kl., 7, 1
- Thue, 1912, Über die gegenseitige Lage gleicher Teile gewisser Zeichenreihen, Norske vid. Selsk. Skr. Mat. Nat. Kl., 1, 1
Cited by
Decision algorithms for Fibonacci-automatic words, II: Related sequences and avoidability
Du, C. F., Mousavi, H., Rowland, E., Schaeffer, L., & Shallit, J. (2017) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2016.10.005 · Cited by 16
Self-citationAvoiding 3/2-powers over the natural numbers
Rowland, E., & Shallit, J. (2012) · Discrete Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.disc.2011.12.019 · Cited by 7
Self-citationRowland, E., & Yassawi, R. (2016) · Advances in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.aam.2016.11.005 · Cited by 7
Avoiding Fractional Powers over the Natural Numbers
Pudwell, L., & Rowland, E. (2018) · The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · doi:10.37236/6678 · Cited by 4
Avoiding 5/4-Powers on the Alphabet of Nonnegative Integers
Rowland, E., & Stipulanti, M. (2020) · The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · doi:10.37236/9581 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Guay-Paquet, M., & Shallit, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- ORCID
- Shallit, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Discrete Mathematics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6245-6254
- ISSN
- 0012-365X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079923544
- Semantic Scholar
- a9f4b431e4219b738f5601d610f911a9127de23a
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 1466 d)
- Locations
- Discrete Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
- Keywords
- square-free words, overlap-free words, infinite words, greedy algorithm, morphisms, natural numbers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding squares and overlaps over the natural numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.disc.2009.06.004
- The paper
- Guay-Paquet, M., & Shallit, J. (2009). Avoiding squares and overlaps over the natural numbers. Discrete Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2009.06.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.