Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7semigroups and automata theoryAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsAlgorithms and Data Compression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Avoiding 3/2-powers over the natural numbers

Open access
Rowland, Eric, Shallit, Jeffrey·2012·Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

In this paper, we answer the following question: what is the lexicographically least sequence over the natural numbers that avoids 32-powers?

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper determines the lexicographically least infinite word over the natural numbers avoiding 3/2-powers, showing it has a compact morphic description and is 6-regular. It also studies the variant avoiding only exact 3/2-powers and shows its structure is closely related.

Key findings

  • The lexicographically least 3/2-power-free word \(w_{3/2}\) begins \(01203102130120410214012031021501204102130120310214\cdots\), is 6-regular, and satisfies \(w_{3/2}=\tau(\phi^\omega(3))\) for explicitly defined morphisms \(\phi,\tau\).
  • \(w_{3/2}\) is proved 3/2-power-free and lexicographically least: decrementing any nonzero symbol introduces a 3/2-power, with factors such as \(00\), \(020\), \(030\), \(040\), \(101\), and \(202\) appearing in the case analysis.
  • The variant \(x_{3/2}\), the lexicographically least word over \(\mathbb N\) avoiding exact 3/2-powers, is also 6-regular and satisfies \(x_{3/2}=\upsilon(\phi^\omega(3))\); it contains squares, but its only square factors are \(00\) and \(11\), so it is overlap-free.
  • The proof handles factors \(xyx\) with \(|y|=|x|\) or \(|y|=|x|-1\) via residue cases modulo 10, and modulo 12 for \(x_{3/2}\); one subcase requires examining 30 cases.

Methods

  • The authors define an infinite sequence \(v\) via a period-10 pseudoperiodic/self-similar construction, then prove it is 3/2-power-free by showing no factor \(xyx\) with \(|y|=|x|\) or \(|y|=|x|-1\) occurs, using case analysis on \(k \bmod 10\).
  • To prove lexicographic minimality, they show that decrementing any nonzero entry of \(v\) (or of \(y\) for \(x_{3/2}\)) creates a 3/2-power, often in the preceding 15 or 30 symbols.
  • They give morphism descriptions and use \(k\)-regularity; for the exact-power variant they derive analogous residue cases modulo 12 and use base-6 representations in auxiliary sequences.

Limitations

  • The paper states that a deeper understanding of the lexicographically least word avoiding \(\alpha\)-powers for arbitrary \(\alpha\) remains open; computer experiments suggest a similar structure for 4/3-powers, but it is not known whether the lexicographically least word avoiding 5/2-powers uses only finitely many distinct letters.
  • Evident from the text: parts of the proof are case-based and “tedious,” with some cases left to the reader (e.g., 30 cases in one verification), which limits transparency.
  • In the supplied text, several displayed formulas are marked “formula-not-decoded,” so some details cannot be independently checked from this text alone. (Evident from supplied text, not a stated paper limitation.)

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.disc.2011.12.019

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 3 Not valid · 1 Not checked · 25 Own results and interpretations

17 more claims

Create a free account to see all 29 claims and to verify the 1 reference still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 5
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Rowland, E., & Shallit, J.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Shallit, Jeffrey
Venue
Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
312
Issue
6
Pages
1282-1288
ISSN
0012-365X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153808094
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Discrete Mathematics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
natural numbers, combinatorics on words

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding 3/2-powers over the natural numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.disc.2011.12.019
The paper
Rowland, E., & Shallit, J. (2012). Avoiding 3/2-powers over the natural numbers. Discrete Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2011.12.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.