Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases
Abstract
There is a strong relationship between liver and gut: the portal system receives blood from the gut, and intestinal blood content activates liver functions. The liver, in turn, affects intestinal functions through bile secretion into the intestinal lumen. Alterations of intestinal microbiota seem to play an important role in induction and promotion of liver damage progression, in addition to direct injury resulting from different causal agents. Bacterial overgrowth, immune dysfunction, alteration of the luminal factors, and altered intestinal permeability are all involved in the pathogenesis of complications of liver cirrhosis, such as infections, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and renal failure. Probiotics have been suggested as a useful integrative treatment of different types of chronic liver damage, for their ability to augment intestinal barrier function and prevent bacterial translocation. This review summarizes the main literature findings about the relationships between gut microbiota and chronic liver disease, both in the pathogenesis and in the treatment by probiotics of the liver damage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have shown that probiotics are effective in treating liver diseases in animal models and patients.
“Although a large number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of probiotics in treating liver diseases both in animal models and in patients (reviewed elsewhere118,119), substantial controversy remains”
From The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation (2017) · cites this paper as [119]
Particular concern relates to probiotics' potential to create systemic infections.
“Of these, particular concern relates to probiotics potential to create (not improve or treat) systemic infections [49, 64, 215].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [215]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Cesaro, C., Tiso, A., Del Prete, A., Cariello, R., Tuccillo, C., Cotticelli, G., del Vecchio Blanco, C., & Loguercio, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Cesaro, Claudia
- Venue
- Digestive and Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 431-438
- ISSN
- 1590-8658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077790453
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digestive and Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, probiotics, chronic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, gut-liver axis, bacterial overgrowth, intestinal permeability, intestinal barrier function, bacterial translocation, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, liver failure, immune dysfunction, bile
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Liver Diseases, Bacterial Translocation, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review