The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results
Abstract
Background To date, no systematic examination of the preparedness of individual health care providers and their response capabilities during a large-scale disaster has been conducted. As a result, very little is known about what knowledge, skills and abilities, or professional competencies are needed, or how professional competency requirements may change depending on the circumstances of a disaster. The objective of this pilot study was to collect, explore, and describe background data on professional competencies from health care providers who were involved in the Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita disaster responses. Methods Utilizing an anonymous survey of a convenience sample, 200 health care providers attending 2 disaster conferences were asked to respond to open-ended questions about the competencies they needed and performed during their disaster response. Results Of the 200 respondents, registered nurses (37%) and physicians (24%) were the largest categories of providers. Basic clinical care (39%) and triage (26%) were the most frequent response skills reported; the areas wherein respondents felt least prepared were disaster-specific response skills (22%) and systems issues (34%). Only 22% of respondents reported that they did not know a specific skill. The 200 respondents made 495 individual recommendations for future responders, including actions to improve the respondent's personal preparedness (23%) and the need for training (25%). However, only 3% of the recommendat…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent research on response professionals deals largely with organizational preparedness and professional competencies (i.e., whether or not an individual has the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform their professional response duties) with a focus on health care professionals (Parker et al. 2005;Slepski 2007).”
In the citing paper
“However, preparedness measures can help their families, and public health professionals admit that one of their primary concerns during a hazard event is the protection of their family (Slepski 2007).”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Slepski, 2005, Emergency preparedness: concept development for nursing practice, Nurs Clin North Am, 40, 419, 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.04.011 · DOI
- Everly, 2002, Thoughts on training guidelines in emergency mental health and crisis intervention, Int J Emerg Ment Health, 4, 139
- Farmer, 2006, Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals, Crit Care Med, 34, S56, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000199989.44467.2E · DOI
- Veenema, 2002, Chemical and biological terrorism preparedness for staff development specialists, J Nurs Staff Develop, 19, 215, 10.1097/00124645-200309000-00001 · DOI
- Waeckerle JA. Emergency departments: the Achilles heel of domestic preparedness. Paper presentation at the Future of Emergency Care Conference. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; February 2-4, 2004.
- Gebbie, 2002, Emergency and disaster preparedness: core competencies for nurses, Am J Nurs, 102, 46, 10.1097/00000446-200201000-00023 · DOI
- Streubert, 1991, Phenomenologic research as a theoretic initiative in community health nursing, Public Health Nurs, 8, 119, 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1991.tb00655.x · DOI
- Hinton Walker, 2005, Research issues in preparedness for mass casualty events, disaster, war and terrorism, Nurs Clin North Am, 40, 551, 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.04.008 · DOI
Cited by
Corwin, K. A., Brand, B. D., Hubbard, M. L., & Johnston, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Volcanology · doi:10.1186/s13617-017-0055-8 · Cited by 31
Taghizadeh, Z., Khoshnam Rad, M., & Montazeri, A. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.01.010 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Slepski, L. A.
- Venue
- Disaster Management & Response
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 99-110
- ISSN
- 1540-2487
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
