Cited by 485Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsInfant Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion regulation in parenthood

Open access

Abstract

Emotion regulation, defined as the capacity to influence one's experience and expression of emotion, is a complex skill now recognized to evolve throughout the lifetime. Here we examine the role of emotion regulation in parenthood, and propose that regulatory function during this period is distinct from the emotion regulation skills acquired and implemented during other periods of life. In this review, we consider the unique demands of caring for a child and recognize that parents have to maintain a regulated state as well as facilitate regulation in their child, especially early in development. We examine neurobiological, hormonal and behavioral shifts during the transition to parenthood that may facilitate parental regulation in response to infant cues. Furthermore, we consider how parents shape emotion regulation in their child, and the clinical implications of regulatory functioning within the parent-child relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.008

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 109 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bowlby, 1969, Vol. 1
  2. Rutherford, 2011, Primary maternal preoccupation: Using neuroimaging techniques to explore the parental brain, Psyche, 65, 973
  3. Waxler, 2011, Maternal perinatal depression – Impact on infant and child development, European Psychiatric Review, 4, 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–484 of 484

Metadata

Authors
Rutherford, H. J. V., Wallace, N. S., Laurent, H. K., & Mayes, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Rutherford, Helena J.V.
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
36
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091646394
Cited by
485
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
27.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Anna Freud Centre
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH083462-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, parenthood, parenting, parent-child relationship, infant cues, affective neuroscience, hormones, child development, clinical implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review