The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Over-imitation’: A review and appraisal of a decade of research
Open accessAbstract
Abstract After seeing an action sequence children and adults tend to copy causally relevant and, more strikingly, even perceivably unnecessary actions in relation to the given goal. This phenomenon, termed “over-imitation”, has inspired much empirical research in the past decade as well as lively theoretical debate on its cognitive underpinnings and putative role in the transmission of cultural knowledge. Here, we offer a comprehensive review of the existing literature to date, accompanied by a table including concise information on 54 published studies testing over-imitation in different species, age groups and cultures. We highlight methodological issues related to task and context that influence over-imitation rates and that should be carefully considered in study designs. We discuss the cognitive and motivational processes underlying and contributing to over-imitation, including normative action parsing, causal reasoning, motives of affiliation and social learning as well as their complex interplay. We conclude that despite the apparent irrationality of over-imitation behavior, recent studies have shown that its performance depends on the specific task, modeled actions and context variables, suggesting that over-imitation should be conceptualized as a contextually flexible and, in fact, a normally highly functional phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000129 · Cited by 4,882
Measurement and Control of Response Bias
Paulhus, D. L. (1991) · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x · Cited by 3,598
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/466029a · Cited by 3,441
Donaldson, M. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,857
Proceedings for the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Dziemianko, M., Clarke, A. D. F., & Keller, F. (2013) · Cited by 1,726
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,648
Rational imitation in preverbal infants
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415755a · Cited by 1,391
Principles of object perception
Spelke, E. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(90)90025-r · Cited by 1,361
Jordan, R. P. (1992) · Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian · doi:10.1300/j103v11n02_05 · Cited by 1,351
The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017 · Cited by 1,030
Cited by
Modern theories of human evolution foreshadowed by Darwin’s Descent of Man
Richerson, P. J., Gavrilets, S., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba3776 · Cited by 69
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Ghadi, M., Hosseinimehr, S. J., Amiri, F. T., Mardanshahi, A., & Noaparast, Z. (2021) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173892 · Cited by 17
Not playing by the rules: Exploratory play, rational action, and efficient search
Chu, J., & Schulz, L. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9yra2 · Cited by 22
Bluet, A., Reynaud, E., Federico, G., Bryche, C., Lesourd, M., Fournel, A., Lamberton, F., Ibarrola, D., Rossetti, Y., & Osiurak, F. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.111870 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoehl, S., Keupp, S., Schleihauf, H., McGuigan, N., Buttelmann, D., & Whiten, A.
- Venue
- Developmental Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 90-108
- ISSN
- 0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907652928
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 64.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Over-imitation’: A review and appraisal of a decade of research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dr.2018.12.002
- The paper
- Hoehl, S., Keupp, S., Schleihauf, H., McGuigan, N., Buttelmann, D., & Whiten, A. (2019). ‘Over-imitation’: A review and appraisal of a decade of research. Developmental Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.12.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
