Cited by 491thermodynamics and calorimetric analysesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Do enthalpy and entropy distinguish first in class from best in class?

Open access
Freire, Ernesto·2008·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

A drug molecule should bind to its target with high affinity and selectivity. Because the binding affinity is a combined function of the binding enthalpy and the binding entropy, extremely high affinity requires that both terms contribute favorably to binding. The binding enthalpy, however, is notoriously more difficult to optimize than the binding entropy, a fact that has resulted in thermodynamically unbalanced molecules that do not achieve optimal potency. In fact, with current technologies, the enthalpic optimization of drug candidates may take years and only appear in second-generation products. Within that context, it is not surprising that structure/activity relationships (SARs) that explicitly incorporate the interplay between enthalpy and entropy and accelerate the optimization process are being developed and gaining popularity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nonpolar desolvation is favorable to binding and is related to the hydrophobic effect when transferring nonpolar molecular surface from bulk water to a nonpolar medium.

    “The nonpolar desolvation, favorable to binding, is related to the hydrophobic effect when transferring nonpolar molecular surface from the bulk water to a medium that is nonpolar, as is the case of many protein binding cavities (Tanford, 1980; Williams and Bardsley, 1999; Freire, 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Lipinski CA Kettner MGHaC Physicochemical Properties and the Discovery of Orally Active Drugs: Technical and People Issues Molecular Informatics Confronting Complexity. Proceedings of the Beilstein Institute Workshop May 13th – May 16th, 2002 2003 Berlin Logos Verlag 59 78

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freire, E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Freire, Ernesto
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
13
Issue
19-20
Pages
869-874
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090907772
Cited by
491
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 36
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM056550, GM 56550, R01GM057144, GM 57144)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
binding enthalpy, binding entropy, enthalpy-entropy compensation, structure-activity relationship, drug-likeness, binding affinity, drug selectivity, thermodynamic balance, medication optimization
MeSH terms
Animals, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Ligands, Receptors, Drug, Thermodynamics, Drug Design, Entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review