The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting physical in drug discovery II: the impact of chromatographic hydrophobicity measurements and aromaticity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates
Veber, D. F., Johnson, S. R., Cheng, H.-Y., Smith, B. R., Ward, K. W., & Kopple, K. D. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020017n · Cited by 8,420
The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry
Leeson, P. D., & Springthorpe, B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2445 · Cited by 2,403
Cited by
The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L., Keserü, G. M., Leeson, P. D., Rees, D. C., & Reynolds, C. H. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4163 · Cited by 1,181
Extended pharmacodynamic responses observed upon PROTAC-mediated degradation of RIPK2
Mares, A., Miah, A. H., Smith, I. E. D., Rackham, M., Thawani, A. R., Cryan, J., Haile, P. A., Votta, B. J., Beal, A. M., Capriotti, C., et al. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0868-6 · Cited by 232
Amide-to-Ester Substitution as a Strategy for Optimizing PROTAC Permeability and Cellular Activity
Klein, V. G., Bond, A. G., Craigon, C., Lokey, R. S., & Ciulli, A. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01496 · Cited by 152
Characteristic roadmap of linker governs the rational design of PROTACs
Dong, Y., Ma, T., Xu, T., Feng, Z., Li, Y., Song, L., Yao, X., Ashby, C. R., & Hao, G.-F. (2024) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.007 · Cited by 146
O’ Donovan, D. H., De Fusco, C., Kuhnke, L., & Reichel, A. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01577 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, R. J., Green, D. V. S., Luscombe, C. N., & Hill, A. P.
- Venue
- Drug Discovery Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 822-830
- ISSN
- 1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979189217
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting physical in drug discovery II: the impact of chromatographic hydrophobicity measurements and aromaticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.06.001
- The paper
- Young, R. J., Green, D. V. S., Luscombe, C. N., & Hill, A. P. (2011). Getting physical in drug discovery II: the impact of chromatographic hydrophobicity measurements and aromaticity. Drug Discovery Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
