The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mortality prior to, during and after opioid maintenance treatment (OMT): A national prospective cross-registry study
Abstract
Background Opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) is generally considered to reduce mortality in opiate dependents. However, the level of mortality reduction is still uncertain. This study investigates mortality reductions in an "intention-to-treat" perspective including all dropouts. The mortality reducing effects of OMT are examined both within treatment and post-treatment. The study separates overdose and total mortality reductions.Methods The study is a prospective cross-registry study with up to 7 years follow-up. All opiate dependents in Norway who applied for OMT (a total of 3789 subjects) were cross-linked with data from the death registry from Statistics Norway. Date and cause of death were crossed with dates for initiation and termination of OMT, and subjects' age and gender. A baseline was established from the waiting list mortality rate. Intention-to-treat was investigated by analysing mortality among the entire population that started OMT.Results Mortality in treatment was reduced to RR 0.5 (relative risk) compared with pre-treatment. In the "intention-to-treat" perspective, the mortality risk was reduced to RR 0.6 compared with pre-treatment. The patients who left the treatment programme showed a high-mortality rate, particularly males.Conclusions OMT significantly reduces risk of mortality also when examined in an intention-to-treat perspective. Studies that evaluate effects of OMT only in patients retained in treatment tend to overestimate benefits. Levels of overdose mortality will influence the risk reduction. Cross-registry studies as the current one are an important supplement to other observational designs in this field.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“dropout from opioid substitution treatment is associated with relapse and an increased risk of overdose and death (Clausen et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2003).”
From Feasibility and acceptability of mindful recovery opioid use care continuum (M-ROCC): A concurrent mixed methods study (2021) · cites this paper as Clausen et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_3055 · Cited by 4,182
The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personaltity structure
Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Siever, L. J. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01324-0 · Cited by 769
Amato, L., Davoli, M., A.Perucci, C., Ferri, M., Faggiano, F., & P. Mattick, R. (2005) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2005.02.007 · Cited by 567
Kakko, J., Svanborg, K. D., Kreek, M. J., & Heilig, M. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12600-1 · Cited by 466
Methadone maintenance at different dosages for opioid dependence
Faggiano, F., Vigna‐Taglianti, F., Versino, E., & Lemma, P. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002208 · Cited by 414
Heroin Overdose: Research and Evidence-Based Intervention
Darke, S. G. (2003) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jurban/jtg022 · Cited by 332
A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4‐year period after seeking treatment
Gossop, M., Stewart, D., Treacy, S., & Marsden, J. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00079.x · Cited by 311
Death and survival in a cohort of heroin addicts from London clinics: a 22‐year follow‐up study
Oppenheimer, E., Tobutt, C., Taylor, C., & Andrew, T. (1994) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03309.x · Cited by 272
Methadone Maintenance and Addicts' Risk of Fatal Heroin Overdose
Caplehorn, J. R. M., Dalton, M. Y. N. S., Haldar, F., Petrenas, A.-M., & Nisbet, J. G. (1996) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826089609045806 · Cited by 253
Brugal, M. T., Domingo‐Salvany, A., Puig, R., Barrio, G., García de Olalla, P., & De La Fuente, L. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01089.x · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Johanson, 1981, Recidivistic criminals and their families – morbidity, mortality and abuse of alcohol – a longitudinal-study of earlier youth prison-inmates and of a control-group and their families in 3 generations, Scand. J. Soc. Med., 27
- SIRUS, 2006. The drug situation in Norway 2006. In: SIRUS (Ed.), Annual report to the EMCDDA, Oslo, p. 87.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence
Mattick, R. P., Breen, C. L., Kimber, J., & Davoli, M. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002207.pub4 · Cited by 2,312
Sordo, L., Barrio, G., Bravo, M. J., Indave, B. I., Degenhardt, L., Wiessing, L., Ferri, M., & Pastor-Barriuso, R. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1550 · Cited by 1,816
“…bmj 10 Methadone Gearing et al 1974 Cushman 1977 Grönbladh et al 1990 Caplehorn et al 1996 Buster et al 2002 Scherbaum et al 2002 Davoli et al 2007 Clausen et al 2008 Peles et al 2010 Kimber et al 2015 Cousins et al 2016 Overall Buprenorphine Kimber et al 2015 210.5 5 10 20 50 100 33/14 474…”
BackgroundInfluentialMethadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence
Mattick, R. P., Breen, C., Kimber, J., & Davoli, M. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002209.pub2 · Cited by 1,654
Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Mathers, B., Briegleb, C., Ali, H., Hickman, M., & McLaren, J. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x · Cited by 856
Mortality among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mathers, B. M., Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Lemon, J., Wiessing, L., & Hickman, M. (2013) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.12.108282 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Clausen, T., Anchersen, K., & Waal, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Clausen, Thomas
- ORCID
- Clausen, Thomas
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 151-157
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032728846
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- opioid maintenance treatment, opioid use disorder, mortality reduction, drug overdose deaths, intention-to-treat analysis, treatment discontinuation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Buprenorphine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotics, Prospective Studies, Registries, Time Factors, Drug Overdose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review