Cited by 856Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin and other opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies: Mortality among opioid users

Degenhardt, Louisa, Bucello, Chiara, Mathers, Bradley, Briegleb, Christina, Ali, Hammad, Hickman, Matt, McLaren, Jennifer·2011·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To review the literature on mortality among dependent or regular users of opioids across regions, according to specific causes, and related to a number of demographic and clinical variables. Methods Multiple search strategies included searches of Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO, consistent with the methodology recommended by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group; grey literature searches; and contact of experts for any additional unpublished data from studies meeting inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for crude mortality rates (CMRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), with stratified analyses where possible. Meta-regressions examined potentially important sources of heterogeneity across studies. Results Fifty-eight prospective studies reported mortality rates from opioid-dependent samples. Very high heterogeneity across studies was observed; pooled all-cause CMR was 2.09 per 100 person-years (PY; 95% CI; 1.93, 2.26), and the pooled SMR was 14.66 (95% CI: 12.82, 16.50). Males had higher CMRs and lower SMRs than females. Out-of-treatment periods had higher mortality risk than in-treatment periods (pooled RR 2.38 (CI: 1.79, 3.17)). Causes of death varied across studies, but overdose was the most common cause. Multivariable regressions found the following predictors of mortality rates: country of origin; the proportion of sample injecting; the extent to which populations were recruited from an entire country…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Mathers, B., Briegleb, C., Ali, H., Hickman, M., & McLaren, J.
Affiliations
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Degenhardt, Louisa
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-04
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
32-51
ISSN
0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1958535246
Cited by
856
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 32
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007543/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, heroin use, mortality, standardized mortality ratio, opioid overdose, addiction treatment, intravenous drug use, sex differences, causes of death, mortality risk factors, international variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Asia, Cause of Death, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Opioid-Related Disorders, North America, Recurrence, Time Factors, HIV Infections, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Australasia, Young Adult, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review