Cited by 47Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Opioid challenge evaluation of blockade by extended-release naltrexone in opioid-abusing adults: Dose–effects and time-course

Open access
Bigelow, George E., Preston, Kenzie L., Schmittner, John, Dong, Qunming, Gastfriend, David R.·2012·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Oral naltrexone's effectiveness as an opioid antagonist has been limited due to poor patient adherence. A long-acting naltrexone formulation may be beneficial. This study evaluated the effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX), targeted for a one-month duration of action, in blocking opioid agonist challenge effects in humans.Methods Outpatient non-dependent opioid abusers (N=27) were randomly assigned to a single double-blind IM administration of 75, 150, or 300 mg XR-NTX. To assess the extent of opioid blockade, hydromorphone challenges (0, 3, 4.5, 6 mg IM in ascending order at 1-h intervals [up to 13.5 mg total]) were given at pretreatment baseline and on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56. Opioid blockade was assessed via (1) tolerability of the ascending hydromorphone doses; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) ratings of subjective opioid effects and (3) pupil diameter. Effects on the VAS and pupils were assessed via the slope of the time-action function over ascending hydromorphone doses, with zero slope indicating complete blockade.Results Blockade of the VAS "any drug effect" response to 3 mg hydromorphone was complete for 14, 21, and 28 days, respectively, for the XR-NTX doses of 75, 150, and 300 mg. Subjective effects were more readily blocked than was pupil constriction. Higher hydromorphone doses produced only modest increases in agonist effects. With the 300 mg XR-NTX dose the slope of VAS responses remained at or near zero for one month even with maximal cumulative hydromorphone dosing.Conclusions These data quantify the month-long opioid blockade underlying XR-NTX's efficacy in opioid dependence treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.018

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extended-release naltrexone releases enough naltrexone to block opioid euphoria for about one month after injection.

    “Extended-release naltrexone gradually releases sufficient naltrexone to block the euphoric effects of opioids for approximately 1 month after injection and is efficacious as compared with placebo.9–12”
  • Extended-release naltrexone is efficacious relative to placebo for preventing relapse to opioid dependence.

    “Extended-release naltrexone gradually releases sufficient naltrexone to block the euphoric effects of opioids for approximately 1 month after injection and is efficacious as compared with placebo.9–12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gonzales JP Brogden RN 1988 Naltrexone: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of opioid dependence Drugs 35 192 213 2836152

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bigelow, G. E., Preston, K. L., Schmittner, J., Dong, Q., & Gastfriend, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Alkermes (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bigelow, George E.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
123
Issue
1-3
Pages
57-65
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038011254
Cited by
47
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • GW Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (n43aa001002-000)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (N43AA001002)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (Z01DA000175, R43DA013531)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
extended-release naltrexone, opioid antagonists, opioid blockade, opioid use disorder, dose-response relationship, time course, miosis, injectable naltrexone, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Delayed-Action Preparations, Hydromorphone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotics, Oxygen, Pupil, Skin Temperature, Time Factors, Respiratory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review