Trajectories of criteria of nicotine dependence from adolescence to early adulthood
Open accessAbstract
Background To identify patterns and correlates of developmental trajectories of DSM-IV nicotine dependence criteria from adolescence to early adulthood. Methods The analytical sample of lifetime smokers (N=877) is from a longitudinal cohort of 6th-10th graders drawn from an urban school system. Subjects were interviewed 5 times at 6-month intervals and once 4.5 years later. Growth mixture models were estimated to identify trajectories of DSM-IV nicotine dependence criteria over ages 12-23. Results A four-class solution fitted the data best: No dependence criteria (class 1, 32.0%); early onset/chronic course (class 2, 26.1%); early onset/remission (class 3, 15.4%); late onset (class 4, 26.5%). There appeared to be three critical periods. At ages 12-15, symptoms increased rapidly. As of age 16, the early onset/chronic class stabilized at high levels of symptoms, the early onset/remission class started its symptomatic decline, and the late onset class experienced a sharp increase in symptoms. At age 20, there was a convergence in the prevalence of symptoms experienced at high (classes 2 and 4) and low levels (classes 1 and 3). Extensiveness of smoking and marijuana use were associated with higher baseline levels of nicotine dependence criteria. Anxiety disorders were associated with all three symptomatic trajectories. Parental smoking and nicotine dependence were associated specifically with the early/chronic class, while pleasant initial sensitivity and earlier onset ages of cigarette and marijuana use characterized the two early onset classes (2 and 3). Conclusions Trajectories of dependence criteria constitute an advantageous phenotype for research and intervention over static summaries of smoking behaviors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People who start smoking as teenagers are more likely to become lifelong smokers than those who start in their 20s or later.
“epidemiologic studies document that individuals who begin smoking as teens are more likely to become life-long smokers than those who start smoking in their 20’s or later.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [237]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences
Kaplan, D. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412986311 · Cited by 1,454 · see citing works
DiFranza, J. R., Savageau, J. A., Fletcher, K., O’Loughlin, J., Pbert, L., Ockene, J. K., McNeill, A. D., Hazelton, J., Friedman, K., Dussault, G., et al. (2007) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.7.704 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Psychiatric disorders and stages of smoking
Breslau, N., Novak, S. P., & Kessler, R. C. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00317-2 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The association of cigarette smoking with depression and anxiety: a systematic review
Fluharty, M., Taylor, A. E., Grabski, M., & Munafò, M. R. (2017) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw140 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hu, M.-C., Griesler, P. C., Schaffran, C., Wall, M. M., & Kandel, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kandel, Denise B.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-289
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3592202
- OpenAlex
- W2054470065
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA026305, R01DA026305, R01DA012697, K-5 DA0081, K05DA000081, DA12697)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- nicotine dependence, developmental trajectories, adolescence, early adulthood, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, growth mixture modeling, cannabis use, anxiety disorders, parental smoking, age of onset
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Child, Educational Status, Ethnicity, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Parents, Sex Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Age of Onset, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review