Cited by 34HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Health behaviors of young adult heroin injectors in the Seattle area.

Cedarbaum, Emily R., Banta-Green, Caleb J.·2016·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Recent indicators point to substantial increases in the number of young heroin users across much of the United States as well as across Washington State. This study characterizes this younger generation of heroin injectors in order to inform public health responses.Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using street-intercept surveys at King County, WA syringe exchange programs in 2013. Survey responses were restricted to heroin injectors (n=389) and then categorized by the participant's age (<30 and ≥30) for a descriptive epidemiological analysis. A manual stepwise logistic regression tested the independent relationship of user characteristics with being under the age of 30.Results In regression analyses, adjusting for other characteristics, young adults were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to: re-use syringes 2-4 times (OR=2.28 compared to those who used a syringe once), share syringes (OR=2.92), report they were "hooked on" prescription-type opioids prior to using heroin (OR=2.54), have had a sexual partner in the prior year (opposite sex OR=7.37, same sex OR=23.29, both genders OR=22.04), and report powder cocaine use in the prior 3 months (OR=2.49) compared to those ages 30 and older. Young adults were significantly less likely to report using pain medicines (OR=0.33), having an abscess in the prior year (OR=0.33) or having tested positive for hepatitis C (OR=0.22) than older adults adjusting for other variables.Conclusions Younger heroin injectors engage in risky injection practices more than older heroin injectors. Along with other significant differences, these findings have implications for outreach programs and medical care for younger heroin injectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.011

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cedarbaum, E. R., & Banta-Green, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
158
Pages
102-109
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2175108478
Cited by
34
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
heroin injection, syringe reuse, needle sharing, prescription opioid use, sexual partners, cocaine use, hepatitis C, health behavior, needle exchange programs, age differences in drug use, Seattle
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Syringes, Washington, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Needle-Exchange Programs, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review