The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone
Open accessAbstract
We have developed a global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone to reflect the regional scales over which the ocean interior varies in terms of biodiversity and function. An integrated approach was necessary, as global gaps in information and variable sampling methods preclude strictly statistical approaches. A panel combining expertise in oceanography, geospatial mapping, and deep-sea biology convened to collate expert opinion on the distributional patterns of pelagic fauna relative to environmental proxies (temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen at mesopelagic depths). An iterative Delphi Method integrating additional biological and physical data was used to classify biogeographic ecoregions and to identify the location of ecoregion boundaries or inter-regions gradients. We define 33 global mesopelagic ecoregions. Of these, 20 are oceanic while 13 are ‘distant neritic.’ While each is driven by a complex of controlling factors, the putative primary driver of each ecoregion was identified. While work remains to be done to produce a comprehensive and robust mesopelagic biogeography (i.e., reflecting temporal variation), we believe that the classification set forth in this study will prove to be a useful and timely input to policy planning and management for conservation of deep-pelagic marine resources. In particular, it gives an indication of the spatial scale at which faunal communities are expected to be broadly similar in composition, and hence can inform application of ecosystem-based management approaches, marine spatial planning and the distribution and spacing of networks of representative protected areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas
Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S. A., et al. (2007) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b570707 · Cited by 4,084
How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045 · cited 2×
“Rigorous quantitative analyses of taxonomic and environmental data for the deep-pelagic zone on a global scale are currently impeded by the spatially patchy and inconsistent manner of data collection over large areas, and because less than 1% of this enormous habitat has been sampled (Webb et al., 2010; Mora et al., 2…”
BackgroundRemote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction
Richards, J. A., & Jia, X. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-29711-1 · Cited by 2,759
UPTAKE OF NEW AND REGENERATED FORMS OF NITROGEN IN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY1
Dugdale, R. C., & Goering, J. J. (1967) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1967.12.2.0196 · Cited by 2,719
The Oceans, Their Physics, Chemistry, and General Biology
Walford, L. A., Iverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W., & Fleming, R. H. (1943) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1438154 · Cited by 2,323
Ecological Geography of the Sea
(2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-455521-1.x5000-1 · Cited by 1,915
From Anchovies to Sardines and Back: Multidecadal Change in the Pacific Ocean
Chavez, F. P., Ryan, J., Lluch-Cota, S. E., & Ñiquen C., M. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075880 · Cited by 1,641
Expanding Oxygen-Minimum Zones in the Tropical Oceans
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., & Mohrholz, V. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153847 · Cited by 1,516
CRISP, J., PELLETIER, D., DUFFIELD, C., ADAMS, A., & NAGY, S. (1997) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-199703000-00010 · Cited by 1,388
Interocean exchange of thermocline water
Gordon, A. L. (1986) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/jc091ic04p05037 · Cited by 1,319
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutton, T. T., Clark, M. R., Dunn, D. C., Halpin, P. N., Rogers, A. D., Guinotte, J., Bograd, S. J., Angel, M. V., Perez, J. A. A., Wishner, K., Haedrich, R. L., Lindsay, D. J., Drazen, J. C., Vereshchaka, A., Piatkowski, U., Morato, T., Błachowiak-Samołyk, K., Robison, B. H., Gjerde, K. M., Pierrot-Bults, A., Bernal, P., Reygondeau, G., & Heino, M.
- Venue
- Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 85-102
- ISSN
- 0967-0637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2619818631
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.006
- The paper
- Sutton, T. T., Clark, M. R., Dunn, D. C., Halpin, P. N., Rogers, A. D., Guinotte, J., Bograd, S. J., Angel, M. V., Perez, J. A. A., Wishner, K., Haedrich, R. L., Lindsay, D. J., Drazen, J. C., Vereshchaka, A., Piatkowski, U., Morato, T., Błachowiak-Samołyk, K., Robison, B. H., Gjerde, K. M., . . . Heino, M. (2017). A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.