Cited by 153Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Enabling ubiquitous patient monitoring: Model, decision protocols, opportunities and challenges

Sneha, Sweta, Varshney, Upkar·2009·Decision Support Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.014

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision making in diagnosis is one of the main tasks of clinical monitoring systems and is often based on retrieved knowledge using vital signs and other information such as electronic health records and metadata.

    “Decision making in diagnosis is one of the main tasks of clinical monitoring systems which is often based on retrieved knowledge using vital signs, and also other information such as electronic health records and metadata [43].”
  • The complication of conditions, especially patient situations, needs more robust and global information rather than sensor abnormal patterns alone.

    “Moreover, the complication of the conditions, especially about patient's situations, needs more robust and global information rather than sensor's abnormal patterns alone [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sneha, S., & Varshney, U.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sneha, Sweta
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
606-619
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139824794
Cited by
153
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
chronic disease management, decision procedures, conceptual model, enabling technologies, healthcare cost reduction, decision criteria, application scenarios, remote patient monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review