CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-faceted trust and distrust prediction for recommender systems

Fang, Hui, Guo, Guibing, Zhang, Jie·2015·Decision Support Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study on website design showed that trust and distrust are affected by different antecedents, and the performance of a trust-aware recommender system was improved by predicting not only trust but also distrust.

    “A study on website design showed that trust and distrust are affected by different antecedents, and the performance of a trust-aware recommender system was improved by predicting not only trust but also distrust (Fang et al., 2015).”

    From Trust, distrust, and appropriate reliance in (X)AI: A conceptual clarification of user trust and survey of its empirical evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as Fang et al., 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Adomavicius, 2005, Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 734, 10.1109/TKDE.2005.99 · DOI
  2. Harrell, 1984, Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction, Statistics in Medicine, 3, 143, 10.1002/sim.4780030207 · DOI
  3. Koren, 2010, Factor in the neighbors: scalable and accurate collaborative filtering, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 4, 1, 10.1145/1644873.1644874 · DOI
  4. Kwon, 2009, Multidimensional credibility model for neighbor selection in collaborative recommendation, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7114, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.071 · DOI
  5. Liben-Nowell, 2007, The link-prediction problem for social networks, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1019, 10.1002/asi.20591 · DOI
  6. Mayer, 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust, The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Opsahl, 2010, Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths, Social Networks, 32, 245, 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006 · DOI
  8. Shafer, 1976, vol. 1
  9. Victor, 2011, Trust-and distrust-based recommendations for controversial reviews, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26, 48, 10.1109/MIS.2011.22 · DOI
  10. Victor, 2013, Enhancing the trust-based recommendation process with explicit distrust, ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 7, 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fang, H., Guo, G., & Zhang, J.
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
71
Pages
37-47
ISSN
0167-9236
DOI
10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.005
Cited by
66
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review