Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision support from financial disclosures with deep neural networks and transfer learning

Open access
Kraus, Mathias, Feuerriegel, Stefan·2017·Decision Support Systems

Abstract

Company disclosures greatly aid in the process of financial decision-making; therefore, they are consulted by financial investors and automated traders before exercising ownership in stocks. While humans are usually able to correctly interpret the content, the same is rarely true of computerized decision support systems, which struggle with the complexity and ambiguity of natural language. A possible remedy is represented by deep learning, which overcomes several shortcomings of traditional methods of text mining. For instance, recurrent neural networks, such as long short-term memories, employ hierarchical structures, together with a large number of hidden layers, to automatically extract features from ordered sequences of words and capture highly non-linear relationships such as context-dependent meanings. However, deep learning has only recently started to receive traction, possibly because its performance is largely untested. Hence, this paper studies the use of deep neural networks for financial decision support. We additionally experiment with transfer learning, in which we pre-train the network on a different corpus with a length of 139.1 million words. Our results reveal a higher directional accuracy as compared to traditional machine learning when predicting stock price movements in response to financial disclosures. Our work thereby helps to highlight the business value of deep learning and provides recommendations to practitioners and executives. We apply deep learning for sentiment analysis of financial news.This yields considerable improvements in forecasting the stock price movements.Additional gains stem from applying transfer learning.Long short-term memory performs overall best.Demonstrates the potential for future applications of deep learning in finance

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2017.10.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Fama, 1965, The behavior of stock-market prices, J. Bus., 38, 34, 10.1086/294743 · DOI
  2. Fisher, 2016, Natural language processing in accounting, auditing and finance: a synthesis of the literature with a roadmap for future research, Intell. Syst. Account. Financ. Manag., 23, 157, 10.1002/isaf.1386 · DOI
  3. Kearney, 2014, Textual sentiment in finance: a survey of methods and models, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 33, 171, 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.02.006 · DOI
  4. Li, 2010, Textual analysis of corporate disclosures: a survey of the literature, J. Account. Lit., 29, 143
  5. Loughran, 2016, Textual analysis in accounting and finance: a survey, J. Account. Res., 54, 1187, 10.1111/1475-679X.12123 · DOI
  6. Feuerriegel, 2016, News-based trading strategies, Decis. Support. Syst., 90, 65, 10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.020 · DOI
  7. de Fortuny, 2014, Evaluating and understanding text-based stock price prediction models, Inf. Process. Manag., 50, 426, 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.12.002 · DOI
  8. Geva, 2014, Empirical evaluation of an automated intraday stock recommendation system incorporating both market data and textual news, Decis. Support. Syst., 57, 212, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.013 · DOI
  9. Schumaker, 2009, Textual analysis of stock market prediction using breaking financial news: the AZFin text system, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 27, 12, 10.1145/1462198.1462204 · DOI
  10. Schumaker, 2009, A quantitative stock prediction system based on financial news, Inf. Process. Manag., 45, 571, 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.001 · DOI
  11. Schumaker, 2012, Evaluating sentiment in financial news articles, Decis. Support. Syst., 53, 458, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.03.001 · DOI
  12. Pang, 2008, Opinion mining and sentiment analysis, Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2, 1, 10.1561/1500000011 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nassirtoussi, 2014, Text mining for market prediction: a systematic review, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 7653, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.009 · DOI
  14. Ravi, 2015, A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: tasks, approaches and applications, Knowl.-Based Syst., 89, 14, 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015 · DOI
  15. Evermann, 2017, Predicting process behaviour using deep learning, Decis. Support. Syst., 10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.003 · DOI
  16. Huang, 2010, Realization of a news dissemination agent based on weighted association rules and text mining techniques, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 6409, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.078 · DOI
  17. Wüthrich, 1998, Daily prediction of major stock indices from textual WWW data, HKIE Trans., 5, 151, 10.1080/1023697X.1998.10667783 · DOI
  18. Li, 2014, News impact on stock price return via sentiment analysis, Knowl.-Based Syst., 69, 14, 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.04.022 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Li, 2014, Enhancing quantitative intra-day stock return prediction by integrating both market news and stock prices information, Neurocomputing, 142, 228, 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.043 · DOI
  20. Chan, 2016, Sentiment analysis in financial texts, Decis. Support. Syst., 94, 53, 10.1016/j.dss.2016.10.006 · DOI
  21. Pröllochs, 2016, Negation scope detection in sentiment analysis: decision support for news-driven trading, Decis. Support. Syst., 88, 67, 10.1016/j.dss.2016.05.009 · DOI
  22. Groth, 2011, An intraday market risk management approach based on textual analysis, Decis. Support. Syst., 50, 680, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.019 · DOI
  23. Socher, 2013, Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank, Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1631, 1631
  24. Goldberg, 2016, A primer on neural network models for natural language processing, J. Artif. Intell. Res., 57, 345, 10.1613/jair.4992 · DOI
  25. Bengio, 1994, Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 5, 157, 10.1109/72.279181 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ding, 2015, Deep Learning For Event-Driven Stock Prediction, Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., 2327
  27. Lau, 1987, A five-state financial distress prediction model, J. Account. Res., 127, 10.2307/2491262 · DOI
  28. Faraway, 2016, Does data splitting improve prediction?, Stat. Comput., 26, 49, 10.1007/s11222-014-9522-9 · DOI
  29. Serrano-Cinca, 2015, Determinants of default in P2P lending, PloS one, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0139427 · DOI
  30. Hagenau, 2013, Automated news reading: stock price prediction based on financial news using context-capturing features, Decis. Support. Syst., 55, 685, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.006 · DOI
  31. Märkle-Huß, 2017, Improving Sentiment Analysis with Document-Level Semantic Relationships from Rhetoric Discourse Structures, 10.24251/HICSS.2017.135 · DOI

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Kraus, M., & Feuerriegel, S.
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
104
Pages
38-48
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762466482
Cited by
312
References
7
FWCI
23.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.