Cited by 621Advanced oxidation water treatmentEnzyme-mediated dye degradationCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

A Comparative study of Fenton and Fenton-like reaction kinetics in decolourisation of wastewater

Wang, Shaobin·2008·Dyes and Pigments

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dyepig.2007.01.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 621

Authors
Wang, S.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shaobin
Venue
Dyes and Pigments
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
714-720
ISSN
0143-7208 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084078182
Cited by
621
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
15.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dyes and Pigments (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
Fenton oxidation, Fenton-like reaction, dye degradation kinetics, pseudo-first-order kinetics, hydrogen peroxide, ferrous iron, iron(III), pH effect, reaction temperature, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review