Cited by 18Dyeing and Modifying Textile FibersAntimicrobial agents and applicationsTextile materials and evaluations

A novel approach to modify and functionalize acid black 1 dye for antimicrobial and UV protective textiles

Nosheen, Anum, Hussain, Muhammad Tahir, Ashraf, Munir, Iqbal, Kashif·2022·Dyes and Pigments

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110486

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nosheen, A., Hussain, M. T., Ashraf, M., & Iqbal, K.
Affiliations
National Textile University (PK)
Corresponding author
Ashraf, Munir
Venue
Dyes and Pigments
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
205
Pages
110486
ISSN
0143-7208 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281988845
Cited by
18
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dyes and Pigments (publishedVersion)
Funders
Higher Education Commision, Pakistan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
Keywords
Acid Black 1, chloroxylenol, antibacterial textiles, UV protection, cotton dyeing, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, wash durability, color fastness, sustainable dyeing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review