Cited by 37Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityEfficiency Analysis Using DEA

Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in Australia: Challenges and policy implications

Shahiduzzaman, Md, Layton, Allan, Alam, Khorshed·2015·Economic Analysis and Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eap.2014.12.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahiduzzaman, M., Layton, A., & Alam, K.
Affiliations
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Shahiduzzaman, Md
Venue
Economic Analysis and Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
45
Pages
100-111
ISSN
0313-5926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972080377
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economic Analysis and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • QUT Business School
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Keywords
energy-related CO2 emissions, emission decomposition, energy efficiency, structural change, service sector, manufacturing industry, per capita emissions, income effects, population effects, climate policy, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review