The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indices of sediment connectivity: opportunities, challenges and limitations
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Indices of connectivity are critical means for moving from qualitative to (semi-)quantitative evaluations of material (e.g., water, sediment and nutrients) transfer across the building blocks of a terrestrial system. In geomorphology, compared to closely related disciplines like ecology and hydrology, the development of indices has only recently started and as such presents opportunities and challenges that merit attention. In this paper, we review existing indices of sediment connectivity and suggest potential avenues of development for meeting current basic and applied research needs. Specifically, we focus on terrestrial geomorphic systems dominated by processes that are driven by hydro-meteorological forcing, neglecting seismically triggered events, karstic systems and environments controlled by eolian processes. We begin by setting a conceptual framework that combines external forcings (drivers) and system (intrinsic) structural and functional properties relevant to sediment connectivity. This framework guides our review of response variables suitable for sediment connectivity indices. In particular, we consider three sample applications concerned with sediment connectivity in: (i) soil studies at the plot scale, (ii) bedload transport at the reach scale, and (iii) sediment budgets at the catchment scale. In relation to the set of response variables identified, we consider data availability and issues of data acquisition for use in indices of sediment connectivity. We classify currently available indices in raster based, object or network based, and indices based on effective catchment area. Virtually all existing indices address the degree of static, structural connectivity only, with limited attention for process-based, functional connectivity counterparts. Most recent developments in indices of sediment connectivity deal, to some extent, with different styles of anthropogenic and hydro-meteorological forcings and with the temporal variability of sediment connectivity, by incorporating additional variables and parameters in existing indices. We believe that, in order to use structural connectivity as explanatory or predictive tool, indices need to be interpretable in relation to geomorphic processes, material properties, and forcing styles and magnitude-frequency spectra. Improvements in this direction can be made through studies shaped to constrain structural-functional correlations across a range of hydro-meteorological scenarios, for example employing field-based techniques such as particle tracking and sediment provenance analysis, as well as numerical simulations. We further consider existing indices in relation to spatial and temporal scales. The latter have immediate implications on the distinction and application between indices and models of sediment connectivity. In this context, we suggest that sediment connectivity over millennial or longer time scales should be dealt with models, as opposed to indices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
The igraph software package for complex network research
Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,078
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Error and attack tolerance of complex networksPreprint
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2000) · Cited by 6,467
Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications
Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050103 · Cited by 3,466
Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., & Merriam, G. (1993) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544927 · Cited by 2,568
Tarboton, D. G. (1997) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr03137 · Cited by 2,476
Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins
Montgomery, D. R., & Buffington, J. M. (1997) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0596:crmimd>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 1,932
A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding
Montgomery, D. R., & Dietrich, W. E. (1994) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/93wr02979 · Cited by 1,714
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckmann, T., Cavalli, M., Cerdan, O., Foerster, S., Javaux, M., Lode, E., Smetanová, A., Vericat, D., & Brardinoni, F.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 187
- Pages
- 77-108
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890375354
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 144
- FWCI
- 31.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indices of sediment connectivity: opportunities, challenges and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.004
- The paper
- Heckmann, T., Cavalli, M., Cerdan, O., Foerster, S., Javaux, M., Lode, E., Smetanová, A., Vericat, D., & Brardinoni, F. (2018). Indices of sediment connectivity: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.