The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landslide failures detection and mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar: Past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
Landslides are geomorphological processes that shape the landscapes of all continents, dismantling mountains and contributing sediments to the river networks. Caused by geophysical and meteorological triggers, including intense or prolonged rainfall, seismic shaking, volcanic activity, and rapid snow melting, landslides pose a serious threat to people, property, and the environment in many areas. Given their abundance and relevance, investigators have long experimented with techniques and tools for landslide detection and mapping using primarily aerial and satellite optical imagery interpreted visually, or processed by semi-automatic or automatic procedures or algorithms. Optical (passive) sensors have known limitations due to their inability to capture Earth surface images through the clouds and to work in the absence of daylight. The alternatives are active, “all-weather” and “day-and-night”, microwave radar sensors capable of seeing through the clouds and working in presence and absence of daylight. We review the literature on the use of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery to detect and map landslide failures – i.e., the single most significant movement episodes in the history of a landslide – and of landslide failure events – i.e., populations of landslides in areas ranging from a few to several thousand square kilometres caused by a single trigger. We examine 54 articles published in representative journals presenting 147 case studies in 32 nations, in all continents, except Antarctica. Analysis of the geographical location of 70 study areas shows that SAR imagery was used to detect and map landslides in most morphological, geological, seismic, meteorological, climate, and land cover settings. The time history of the case studies reveals the increasing interest of the investigators in the use of SAR imagery for landslide detection and mapping, with less than one article per year from 1995 to 2011, rising to about 5 articles per year between 2012 and 2020, and an average period of about 4.2 years between the launch of a satellite and the publication of an article using imagery taken by the satellite. To detect and map landslides, investigators use a common framework that exploits the phase and the amplitude of the electromagnetic return signal recorded in the SAR images, to measure terrain surface properties and their changes. To discriminate landslides from the surrounding stable terrain, a classification of the ground properties is executed by expert visual (heuristic) interpretation, or through numerical (statistical) modelling approaches. Despite undisputed progress over the last 26 years, challenges remain to be faced for the effective use of SAR imagery for landslide detection and mapping. In the article, we examine the theoretical, research, and operational frameworks for the exploitation of SAR images for landslide detection and mapping, and we provide a perspective for future applications considering the existing and the planned SAR satellite missions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,825
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007) · doi:10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 · Cited by 13,640
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
(2007) · doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 · Cited by 13,640
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis
Comaniciu, D., & Meer, P. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.1000236 · Cited by 11,305
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods
Given, L. (2008) · doi:10.4135/9781412963909 · Cited by 6,134
Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., et al. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.803792 · Cited by 5,331
Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space
Okada, Y. (1985) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/bssa0750041135 · Cited by 5,169
Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering
Cheng, Y. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.400568 · Cited by 3,856
Cited by
Ghorbanzadeh, O., Crivellari, A., Ghamisi, P., Shahabi, H., & Blaschke, T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94190-9 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondini, A. C., Guzzetti, F., Chang, K.-T., Monserrat, O., Martha, T. R., & Manconi, A.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 216
- Pages
- 103574
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135436966
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 47.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landslide failures detection and mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar: Past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103574
- The paper
- Mondini, A. C., Guzzetti, F., Chang, K.-T., Monserrat, O., Martha, T. R., & Manconi, A. (2021). Landslide failures detection and mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar: Past, present and future. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.