CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth and Lifestyle Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eating disorder symptoms among undergraduate and graduate students at 12 U.S. colleges and universities

Lipson, SK, Sonneville, KR·2017·Eating Behaviors
DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.12.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives We sought to estimate the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in a large sample of U.S. college students and variations therein across student characteristics.Methods Participants were 9713 students from 12 colleges and universities participating in the Healthy Bodies Study. We used gender-stratified logistic regression to estimate bivariate correlates of elevated eating disorder symptoms, past-month objective binge eating, and past-month compensatory behaviors across student characteristics including age, degree-level, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, first-generation status, citizenship, academic and extracurricular characteristics, and weight status. Eating disorder outcomes were based on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire.Results We observed higher prevalence of objective binge eating among females relative to males (49% versus 30%, p<0.001), but similar prevalence of compensatory behaviors (31% versus 29%). Weight status was the most consistent predictor of eating disorder risk with significantly more symptoms seen among individuals with overweight and obesity. When compared to individuals with a healthy weight, those with overweight had greater eating disorder risk (males OR=3.5; females OR=2.0), binge eating (males OR=2.1; females OR=1.9), and use of compensatory behaviors (males OR=1.5; females OR=1.3).Conclusions This study suggests smaller gender difference in prevalence of eating disorder symptoms than previously reported and identifies students with overweight/obesity as salient targets for campus-based eating disorder screening and early intervention efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.12.003

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lipson, S., & Sonneville, K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Sonneville, KR
Venue
Eating Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
24
Pages
81-88
ISSN
1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.12.003
OpenAlex
W2565385612
Cited by
336
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 7
FWCI
25.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
eating disorder symptoms, university students, binge eating, compensatory behavior, overweight, obesity, weight status, gender differences, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, first-generation college students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Weight, Bulimia, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review