Cited by 634Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Eating disorder symptoms among college students: prevalence, persistence, correlates, and treatment-seeking

Open access
Eisenberg, Daniel, Nicklett, Emily J., Roeder, Kathryn, Kirz, Nina E.·2011·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, correlates, persistence, and treatment-seeking related to symptoms of eating disorders (EDs) in a random sample of college students. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of students at a large university were recruited for an Internet survey in Fall 2005 and a follow-up survey in Fall 2007. METHODS: ED symptoms were measured using the SCOFF screen and adjusted for nonresponse using administrative data and a nonresponse survey. RESULTS: 2,822 (56%) students completed the baseline survey. Among undergraduates the prevalence of positive screens was 13.5% for women and 3.6% for men. Among students with positive screens, 20% had received past-year mental health treatment. In the follow-up sample (N = 753), ED symptoms at baseline significantly predicted symptoms 2 years later. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of EDs were prevalent and persistent among college students in this study. These findings suggest that brief screens can identify a large number of students with untreated EDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2010.546461

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenberg, D., Nicklett, E. J., Roeder, K., & Kirz, N. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2011-11
Volume
59
Issue
8
Pages
700-707
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W1964608703
Cited by
634
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
eating disorders, eating disorder symptoms, university students, prevalence, symptom persistence, treatment seeking, psychotherapy, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Probability, Risk Factors, Students, Time Factors, United States, Universities, Health Behavior, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review