The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Small-molecule PROTACs: An emerging and promising approach for the development of targeted therapy drugs
Open accessAbstract
There are several challenges towards the development and clinical use of small molecule inhibitors, which are currently the main type of targeted therapies towards intracellular proteins. PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) exploit the intracellular ubiquitin-proteasome system to selectively degrade target proteins. Recently, small-molecule PROTACs with high potency have been frequently reported. In this review, we summarize the emerging characteristics of small-molecule PROTACs, such as inducing a rapid, profound and sustained degradation, inducing a robust inhibition of downstream signals, displaying enhanced target selectivity, and overcoming resistance to small molecule inhibitors. In tumor xenografts, small-molecule PROTACs can significantly attenuate tumor progression. In addition, we also introduce recent developments of the PROTAC technology such as homo-PROTACs. The outstanding advantages over traditional small-molecule drugs and the promising preclinical data suggest that small-molecule PROTAC technology has the potential to greatly promote the development of targeted therapy drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The small molecule thalidomide, which binds to the ubiquitously expressed E3 ligase substrate adapter Cereblon (CRBN), has often been used as the E3 ligase-binding moiety in degraders[11].”
From Development of dual and selective degraders of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Kumagai, A., Mercurio, F., Crews, C. M., & Deshaies, R. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.141230798 · Cited by 2,609
Identification of a Primary Target of Thalidomide Teratogenicity
Ito, T., Ando, H., Suzuki, T., Ogura, T., Hotta, K., Imamura, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., & Handa, H. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177319 · Cited by 2,136
Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo target protein degradation
Winter, G. E., Buckley, D. L., Paulk, J., Roberts, J. M., Souza, A., Dhe-Paganon, S., & Bradner, J. E. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1433 · Cited by 1,760
Ohh, M., Park, C. W., Ivan, M., Hoffman, M. A., Kim, T.-Y., Huang, L. E., Pavletich, N., Chau, V., & Kaelin, W. G. (2000) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35017054 · Cited by 1,577
Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm
Lai, A. C., & Crews, C. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.211 · Cited by 1,486
Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by small-molecule PROTACs
Bondeson, D. P., Mares, A., Smith, I. E. D., Ko, E., Campos, S., Miah, A. H., Mulholland, K. E., Routly, N., Buckley, D. L., Gustafson, J. L., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1858 · Cited by 1,356
Structural basis of PROTAC cooperative recognition for selective protein degradation
Gadd, M. S., Testa, A., Lucas, X., Chan, K.-H., Chen, W., Lamont, D. J., Zengerle, M., & Ciulli, A. (2017) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2329 · Cited by 1,242
Hijacking the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cereblon to Efficiently Target BRD4
Lu, J., Qian, Y., Altieri, M., Dong, H., Wang, J., Raina, K., Hines, J., Winkler, J. D., Crew, A. P., Coleman, K., et al. (2015) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.009 · Cited by 1,140
The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation
Nabet, B., Roberts, J. M., Buckley, D. L., Paulk, J., Dastjerdi, S., Yang, A., Leggett, A. L., Erb, M. A., Lawlor, M. A., Souza, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-018-0021-8 · Cited by 1,118
Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions: Progressing toward the Reality
Arkin, M. R., Tang, Y., & Wells, J. A. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.09.001 · Cited by 1,065
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lavanya, 2014, Small molecule inhibitors as emerging cancer therapeutics, Integr Cancer Sci Ther, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives
Zhong, L., Li, Y., Xiong, L., Wang, W., Wu, M., Yuan, T., Yang, W. M., Tian, C., Miao, Z., Wang, T., et al. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00572-w · Cited by 1,813
Exploring the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates
Tsuchikama, K., Anami, Y., Ha, S. Y. Y., & Yamazaki, C. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00850-2 · Cited by 659
PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry
Sun, X., Gao, H., Yang, Y., He, M., Wu, Y., Song, Y.-G., Tong, Y., & Rao, Y. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0101-6 · Cited by 663
PROTACs: An Emerging Therapeutic Modality in Precision Medicine
Nalawansha, D. A., & Crews, C. M. (2020) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.020 · Cited by 523
Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Drug Resistance
Ward, R. A., Fawell, S. E., Floc’h, N., Flemington, V., McKerrecher, D., & Smith, P. D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00383 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- An, S., & Fu, L.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Fu, Liwu
- ORCID
- Fu, Liwu
- Venue
- EBioMedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 553-562
- ISSN
- 2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6197674
- OpenAlex
- W2890850288
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 35
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EBioMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2016A030312014)
- National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China (2018ZX09711002-003-011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, ubiquitin-proteasome system, target selectivity, drug resistance, tumor xenografts, intracellular protein degradation, targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis, Proteasome Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
