Cited by 1,356Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by small-molecule PROTACs

Open access
Bondeson, Daniel P, Mares, Alina, Smith, Ian E D, Ko, Eunhwa, Campos, Sebastien, Miah, Afjal H, Mulholland, Katie E, Routly, Natasha +21 more·2015·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

The current predominant therapeutic paradigm is based on maximizing drug-receptor occupancy to achieve clinical benefit. This strategy, however, generally requires excessive drug concentrations to ensure sufficient occupancy, often leading to adverse side effects. Here, we describe major improvements to the proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) method, a chemical knockdown strategy in which a heterobifunctional molecule recruits a specific protein target to an E3 ubiquitin ligase, resulting in the target's ubiquitination and degradation. These compounds behave catalytically in their ability to induce the ubiquitination of super-stoichiometric quantities of proteins, providing efficacy that is not limited by equilibrium occupancy. We present two PROTACs that are capable of specifically reducing protein levels by >90% at nanomolar concentrations. In addition, mouse studies indicate that they provide broad tissue distribution and knockdown of the targeted protein in tumor xenografts. Together, these data demonstrate a protein knockdown system combining many of the favorable properties of small-molecule agents with the potent protein knockdown of RNAi and CRISPR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.1858

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By changing ubiquitin ligase selectivity, these compounds redirect the ligase to carry out repeated rounds of target ubiquitination catalytically.

    “By reprogramming ubiquitin ligase selectivity, these molecules divert the ligase to drive multiple rounds of target ubiquitination in a catalytic manner16.”
  • A single degrader molecule can degrade multiple protein molecules, a mechanism referred to as event-driven pharmacology, which may increase efficacy.

    “A key promise of TPD is the prospect of increased efficacy due to a single degrader molecule being able to degrade multiple protein molecules, this unique mechanism of action is referred to as event-driven pharmacology (Bondeson et al., 2015).”

    From Mapping the Degradable Kinome Provides a Resource for Expedited Degrader Development (2020) · cites this paper as Bondeson et al., 2015

  • The discovery of small-molecule mimetics of the HIF1α peptide opened the door to the rational design of PROTACs based wholly on small molecular structures - for example, the first PROTACs based on the bromodomain protein inhibitor JQ1 that recruited VHL to degrade bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4).

    “The discovery of small-molecule mimetics of the HIF1α peptide20,21 opened the door to the rational design of PROTACs based wholly on small molecular structures — for example, the first PROTACs based on the bromodomain protein inhibitor JQ1 that recruited VHL to degrade bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4)22,23.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Incorporating a ligand into a PROTAC allows the POI to be degraded without requiring a large excess of drug, resulting in more complete target blockade and a wider therapeutic window.

    “By incorporating the ligand into a PROTAC, which often acts in an iterative or ‘pseudo-catalytic’ fashion by binding and facilitating the interaction of its ligase and POI targets, the POI can be degraded without requiring a large excess of drug, thereby resulting in more complete target blockade and a wider therapeutic window22,48.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Disruption of CRL4CRBN components and the associated cullin-RING ligase machinery results in resistance to lenalidomide in multiple myeloma and lymphoma cells.

    “In genome-wide genetic screens of MM cells and lymphoma cells, disruption of CRL4CRBN components and the associated cullin-RING ligase machinery was found to result in resistance to lenalidomide143–145.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 1,356

Authors
Bondeson, D. P., Mares, A., Smith, I. E. D., Ko, E., Campos, S., Miah, A. H., Mulholland, K. E., Routly, N., Buckley, D. L., Gustafson, J. L., Zinn, N., Grandi, P., Shimamura, S., Bergamini, G., Faelth-Savitski, M., Bantscheff, M., Cox, C., Gordon, D. A., Willard, R. R., Flanagan, J. J., Casillas, L. N., Votta, B. J., den Besten, W., Famm, K., Kruidenier, L., Carter, P. S., Harling, J. D., Churcher, I., & Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Germany) (DE)
  • Arvinas (United States) (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Churcher, Ian
  • Crews, Craig M
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2015-06-10
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
611-617
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W1512690422
Cited by
1,356
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 154 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 5
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007223, T32GM067543)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI084140, R01AI084140)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PROTACs, protein knockdown, E3 ubiquitin ligase, ubiquitination, protein degradation, heterobifunctional molecules, small molecule drugs, tumor xenografts, tissue distribution
MeSH terms
ERRalpha Estrogen-Related Receptor, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Binding Sites, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Models, Molecular, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasm Transplantation, Protein Binding, Receptors, Estrogen, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Mice, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinase 2, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Biocatalysis, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis, MCF-7 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review