Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Townsend, Rosemary, Chmielewska, Barbara, Barratt, Imogen, Kalafat, Erkan, van der Meulen, Jan, Gurol-Urganci, Ipek, O'Brien, Pat, Morris, Edward, Draycott, Tim, Thangaratinam, Shakila, Doare, Kirsty Le, Ladhani, Shamez, von Dadelszen, Peter, Magee, Laura A., Khalil, Asma·2021·eClinicalMedicine

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on healthcare systems globally, with a worrying increase in adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. We aimed to assess the changes in maternity healthcare provision and healthcare-seeking by pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the effects of the pandemic on provision of, access to and attendance at maternity services (CRD42020211753). We searched MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from January 1st, 2020 to April 17th 2021 for controlled observational studies and research letters reporting primary data comparing maternity healthcare-seeking and healthcare delivery during compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic. Case reports and series, systematic literature reviews, and pre-print studies were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed on comparable outcomes that were reported in two or more studies. Data were combined using random-effects meta-analysis, using risk ratios (RR) or incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Findings Of 4743 citations identified, 56 were included in the systematic review, and 21 in the meta-analysis. We identified a significant decrease in the number of antenatal clinic visits (IRR 0614, 95% CI 0486–0776, P <00001, I 2 =54.6%) and unscheduled care visits (IRR 0741, 95% CI 0602–0911, P = 00046, I 2 =00%) per week, and an increase in virtual or remote antenatal care (IRR 4656 95% CI 7762–2794, P <00001, I 2 =90.6%) and hospitalisation of unscheduled attendees (RR 1214, 95% CI 1118–1319, P <00001, I 2 =00%). There was a decrease in the use of GA for category 1 Caesarean sections (CS) (RR 0529, 95% CI 0407–0690, P <00001, I 2 =00%). There was no significant change in intrapartum epidural use ( P = 00896) or the use of GA for elective CS ( P = 079) Interpretation Reduced maternity healthcare-seeking and healthcare provision during the COVID-19 pandemic has been global, and must be considered as potentially contributing to worsening of pregnancy outcomes observed during the pandemic. Funding None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100947

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Townsend, R., Chmielewska, B., Barratt, I., Kalafat, E., van der Meulen, J., Gurol-Urganci, I., O'Brien, P., Morris, E., Draycott, T., Thangaratinam, S., Doare, K. L., Ladhani, S., von Dadelszen, P., Magee, L. A., & Khalil, A.
Venue
eClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
37
Pages
100947
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173726197
Cited by
199
References
9
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100947
The paper
Townsend, R., Chmielewska, B., Barratt, I., Kalafat, E., van der Meulen, J., Gurol-Urganci, I., O'Brien, P., Morris, E., Draycott, T., Thangaratinam, S., Doare, K. L., Ladhani, S., von Dadelszen, P., Magee, L. A., & Khalil, A. (2021). Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.