Cited by 5,670Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Ben Van Den, Assem·2020·International Coaching Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews of interventions.

    “This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, conducted in accordance with the Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews of interventions, 53 and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. 54”
  • Several available studies lack an appropriate comparator or control group, which can directly impact the observed effect of the AI-augmented interventions and tools reported in the literature.

    “Moreover as mentioned by other reviews in the field, several of the available studies lack an appropriate comparator or control group which can directly impact the observed effect of the AI-augmented interventions and tools reported in the literature (6, 17–23, 52–54, 57, 58, 67, 72).”
  • The review employed a systematic literature review method in accordance with Charles Sturt University guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook [1].

    “For this work, a systematic literature review (SLR) method is employed in accordance with Charles Sturt University guidelines.Higgins et al. in the “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention” [1] define a systematic review as one that “seeks to collate evidence that fits prespecified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A.
Venue
International Coaching Psychology Review
Published
2020
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
123-125
ISSN
  • 1750-2764 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8753
OpenAlex
W4320164613
Cited by
5,670
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 839 · 2023: 903 · 2022: 875 · 2021: 780 · 2020: 427 · 2019: 309 · 2018: 243 · 2017: 229 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
FWCI
154.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Coaching Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
systematic reviews, intervention research, evidence synthesis, research methodology, coaching psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review