The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background We updated a 2017 systematic review and compared the effects of HIV self-testing (HIVST) to standard HIV testing services to understand effective service delivery models among the general population. Methods We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing testing outcomes with HIVST to standard testing in the general population and published between January 1, 2006 and June 4, 2019. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) were reported. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology. Findings We identified 14 eligible RCTs, 13 of which were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Support provided to self-testers ranged from no/basic support to one-on-one in-person support. HIVST increased testing uptake overall (RR:2.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.69–2.58; p < 0.0001;13 RCTs; moderate certainty evidence) and by service delivery model including facility-based distribution, HIVST use at facilities, secondary distribution to partners, and community-based distribution. The number of persons diagnosed HIV-positive among those tested (RR:0.81, 0.45–1.47; p = 0.50; 8 RCTs; moderate certainty evidence) and number linked to HIV care/treatment among those diagnosed (RR:0.95, 0.79–1.13; p = 0.52; 6 RCTs; moderate certainty evidence) were similar between HIVST and standard testing. Reported harms/adverse events with HIVST were rare and appeared similar to standard testing (RR:2.52: 0.52–12.13; p = 0.25; 4 RCTs; very low certainty evidence). Interpretation HIVST appears to be safe and effective among the general population in sub-Saharan Africa with a range of delivery models. It identified and linked additional people with HIV to care. These findings support the wider availability of HIVST to reach those who may not otherwise access testing. Funding This review was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1177903), Unitaid (PO#101400-600 and PO#84770-600) and the United States Agency for International Development (US-2015-0839 and US-2016-940). TCW, AJR, PW received grants during the conduct of the study (National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme [PG-482 1212-20006]). EC (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), EG (ViiV Healthcare research grant) and CJ (the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Unitaid, and the United States Agency for International Development) received grants outside of submitted work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings are similar to those reported in HIV self-testing studies, which indicated high levels of safety and efficacy across self-testing in different disease areas.
“Findings are similar to those reported in HIV self-testing studies, which indicated high levels of safety and efficacy across self-testing in different disease areas (76-78).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Johnson, 2017, Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Int AIDS Soc, 20, 21594, 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594 · DOI
- Kelvin, 2020, The evidence for HIV self-testing to increase HIV testing rates and the implementation challenges that remain, Curr HIV/AIDS Rep, 17, 281, 10.1007/s11904-020-00504-3 · DOI
- Witzel, 2020, Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Med, 18, 381, 10.1186/s12916-020-01835-z · DOI · Paper page
- Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med, 6, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
- Witzel, 2017, Consolidating emerging evidence surrounding HIVST and HIVSS: a rapid systematic mapping protocol, Syst Rev, 6, 72, 10.1186/s13643-017-0452-4 · DOI
- Higgins, 2011, The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, 343, d5928, 10.1136/bmj.d5928 · DOI · Paper page
- Choko, 2019, HIV self-testing alone or with additional interventions, including financial incentives, and linkage to care or prevention among male partners of antenatal care clinic attendees in Malawi: an adaptive multi-arm, multi-stage cluster randomised trial, PLoS Med, 16, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002719 · DOI
- Gichangi, 2018, Impact of HIV self-test distribution to male partners of ANC clients: results of a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 79, 467, 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001838 · DOI
- Indravudh, 2019, Community-led delivery of HIV self-testing to improve HIV testing, ART initiation and broader social outcomes in rural Malawi: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial, BMC Infect Dis, 19, 814, 10.1186/s12879-019-4430-4 · DOI
- Kelvin, 2019, Announcing the availability of oral HIV self-test kits via text message to increase HIV testing among hard-to-reach truckers in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial, BMC Public Health, 19, 10.1186/s12889-018-6345-1 · DOI
- Kelvin, 2018, Offering self-administered oral HIV testing to truck drivers in Kenya to increase testing: a randomized controlled trial, AIDS Care, 30, 47, 10.1080/09540121.2017.1360997 · DOI
- Masters, 2016, Promoting partner testing and couples testing through secondary distribution of HIV self-tests: a randomized clinical trial, PLoS Med, 13, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002166 · DOI
- Patel, 2018, Increasing HIV testing engagement through provision of home HIV self-testing kits for patients who decline testing in the emergency department: a pilot randomisation study, Sex Transm Infect, 95, 358, 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053592 · DOI
- Indavudh, 2018, Scaling up HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of technology, policy and evidence, Curr Opin HIV Res, 31
- Hayes, 2019, Effect of universal testing and treatment on HIV incidence — HPTN 071 (PopART), N Engl J Med, 381, 207, 10.1056/NEJMoa1814556 · DOI
- Figueroa, 2015, Attitudes and acceptability on HIV self-testing among key populations: a literature review, AIDS Behav, 19, 1949, 10.1007/s10461-015-1097-8 · DOI
- Njau, 2019, A systematic review of qualitative evidence on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV self-testing in Africa, BMC Public Health, 19, 1289, 10.1186/s12889-019-7685-1 · DOI
- Stevens, 2018, A global review of HIV self-testing: themes and implications, AIDS Behav, 22, 497, 10.1007/s10461-017-1707-8 · DOI
- Hatzold, 2019, HIV self-testing: breaking the barriers to uptake of testing among men and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa, experiences from STAR demonstration projects in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, J Int AIDS Soc, 22, e25244, 10.1002/jia2.25244 · DOI
- Lebina, 2019, Feasibility of community-based HIV self-screening in South Africa: a demonstration project, BMC Public Health, 19, 898, 10.1186/s12889-019-7122-5 · DOI
- MacPherson, 2014, Effect of optional home initiation of HIV care following HIV self-testing on antiretroviral therapy initiation among adults in Malawi: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA, 312, 372, 10.1001/jama.2014.6493 · DOI
- Kumwenda, 2019, Exploring social harms during distribution of HIV self-testing kits using mixed-methods approaches in Malawi, J Int AIDS Soc, 22, e25251, 10.1002/jia2.25251 · DOI
- Mulubwa, 2019, Community based distribution of oral HIV self-testing kits in Zambia: a cluster-randomised trial nested in four HPTN 071 (PopART) intervention communities, Lancet, 6, e81, 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30258-3 · DOI
- Nguyen, 2019, Community-led HIV testing services including HIV self-testing and assisted partner notification services in Vietnam: lessons from a pilot study in a concentrated epidemic setting, J Int AIDS Soc, 22, e25301, 10.1002/jia2.25301 · DOI
- Collaboration, 2017, Evaluating the feasibility and uptake of a community-led HIV testing and multi-disease health campaign in rural Uganda, J Int AIDS Soc, 20, 21514, 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21514 · DOI
- Choko, 2020, Measuring linkage to HIV treatment services following HIV self-testing in low-income settings, J Int AIDS Soc, 23, e25548, 10.1002/jia2.25548 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Jamil, M. S., Eshun-Wilson, I., Witzel, T. C., Siegfried, N., Figueroa, C., Chitembo, L., Msimanga-Radebe, B., Pasha, M. S., Hatzold, K., Corbett, E., Barr-DiChiara, M., Rodger, A. J., Weatherburn, P., Geng, E., Baggaley, R., & Johnson, C.
- Affiliations
- World Health Organization (CH)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK)
- Population Services International (US)
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MW)
- University College London (GB)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jamil, Muhammad S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- eClinicalMedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 100991
- ISSN
- 2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8271120
- OpenAlex
- W3182981674
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1177903)
- World Health Organization
- Wellcome Trust (200901/Z/16/Z)
- ViiV Healthcare
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002346)
- Programme Grants for Applied Research
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood donation and transfusion practices
- Keywords
- HIV self-testing, HIV testing services, HIV testing uptake, linkage to HIV care, HIV diagnosis, community-based distribution, sub-Saharan Africa, general population, service delivery models, HIV testing access, people who inject drugs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
