The DOI matches its Crossref record; 225 of the 225 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: High rates of vaccination worldwide are required to establish a herd immunity and stop the current COVID-19 pandemic evolution. Vaccine hesitancy is a major barrier in achieving herd immunity across different populations. This study sought to conduct a systematic review of the current literature regarding attitudes and hesitancy to receiving COVID-19 vaccination worldwide. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was performed on July 5th, 2021, using developed keywords. Inclusion criteria required the study to (1) be conducted in English; (2) investigate attitudes, hesitancy, and/or barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among a given population; (3) utilize validated measurement techniques; (4) have the full text paper available and be peer-reviewed prior to final publication. FINDINGS: Following PRISMA guidelines, 209 studies were included. The Newcastle Ottawa (NOS) scale for cross-sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the studies.Overall, vaccine acceptance rates ranged considerably between countries and between different time points, with Arabian countries showing the highest hesitancy rates compared with other parts of the world. INTERPRETATION: A variety of different factors contributed to increased hesitancy, including having negative perception of vaccine efficacy, safety, convenience, and price. Some of the consistent socio-demographic groups that were identified to be associated with increased hesitancy included: women, younger participants, and people who were less educated, had lower income, had no insurance, living in a rural area, and self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Grech, V., Gauci, C., & Agius, S. (2020) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105213 · Cited by 117
Retracted(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 · Cited by 5,573
A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine
Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., Kimball, S., & El-Mohandes, A. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9 · Cited by 2,904
Vaccine hesitancy: An overview
Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. A. (2013) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.4161/hv.24657 · Cited by 2,172
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates
Sallam, M. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9020160 · Cited by 2,128
Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19
Dror, A. A., Eisenbach, N., Taiber, S., Morozov, N. G., Mizrachi, M., Zigron, A., Srouji, S., & Sela, E. (2020) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y · Cited by 1,714
Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732319889354 · Cited by 1,558
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US
Malik, A. A., McFadden, S. M., Elharake, J., & Omer, S. B. (2020) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495 · Cited by 1,540
Murphy, J., Vallières, F., Bentall, R. P., Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Hartman, T. K., McKay, R., Bennett, K., Mason, L., Gibson-Miller, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9 · Cited by 1,283
Cited by
It is not too late to achieve global covid-19 vaccine equity
Yamey, G., Garcia, P., Hassan, F., Mao, W., McDade, K. K., Pai, M., Saha, S., Schellekens, P., Taylor, A., & Udayakumar, K. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070650 · Cited by 114
Vaccine hesitancy educational tools for healthcare providers and trainees: A scoping review
Lip, A., Pateman, M., Fullerton, M. M., Chen, H. M., Bailey, L., Houle, S., Davidson, S., & Constantinescu, C. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.093 · Cited by 74
Benham, J. L., Atabati, O., Oxoby, R. J., Mourali, M., Shaffer, B., Sheikh, H., Boucher, J.-C., Constantinescu, C., Parsons Leigh, J., Ivers, N. M., et al. (2021) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/30424 · Cited by 67
Luk, T. T., Lui, J. H. T., & Wang, M. P. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/39063 · Cited by 43
Maugeri, A., Barchitta, M., & Agodi, A. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10010119 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W.
- Venue
- EClinicalMedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 101113
- ISSN
- 2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3197228561
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 225
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113
- The paper
- Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W. (2021). Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.