Cited by 50Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Theory and Simulation-Based Education: Definitions, Worldviews and Applications

Nestel, Debra, Bearman, Margaret·2015·Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.013

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nestel, D., & Bearman, M.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nestel, Debra
Venue
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
349-354
ISSN
1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1907564973
Cited by
50
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based education, educational theory, post-positivism, interpretivism, critical theory, cognitive load theory, reflective cycle, informal learning, cultural-historical activity theory, nursing education, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review