Cited by 78Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesAgricultural safety and regulations

Toxicity and hazard assessment of fipronil to Daphnia pulex

Stark, John D., Vargas, Roger I.·2005·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Hazard assessments based on two measures of toxicity were conducted for the water flea, Daphnia pulex (Leydig) exposed to the insecticide, fipronil. The measures of toxicity obtained were 48 h acute lethal concentration estimates, and a direct measure of population growth rate, the 10-day instantaneous rate of increase (r(i)). Additionally, life tables were developed after exposure to several concentrations to tease out the apparent sublethal effects of this insecticide to D. pulex. The acute LC(50) was estimated to be 0.0156 (0.0088-0.083) mg/L. In the 10-day population growth rate study, extinction of D. pulex populations occurred after exposure to 0.08 mg/L of fipronil, which was equivalent to the 48 h acute LC(75). The NOEC and LOEC for population size after a 10-day exposure to fipronil were 0.03 and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. An expected environmental concentration (EEC) in freshwater lakes/ponds based on an application rate of 250 mg ai/ha (recommended rate for use in Tephritid fruit fly control programs) was estimated to be 0.00017 mg/L. Hazard assessments were developed by dividing the EEC by the LC(50) and NOEC for population size. The assessments based on the LC(50) and NOEC for population size were 0.011 and 0.0057, respectively, indicating that fipronil does not pose a hazard to D. pulex when applied at the rates recommended for control of Tephritid fruit flies. Life tables were developed after exposure to two insecticide concentrations and a control. Exposure to 0.015 mg/L, the approximate 48 h acute LC(50), resulted in only a slight decrease in the net reproductive rate (R(o)), birth rate (b), and intrinsic rate of increase (r(m)) and an increase in generation time (T), death rate (d), and doubling time (DT) compared to the control. Exposure to 0.03 mg/L, the approximate 48 h acute LC(60), and NOEC in the 10-day study, resulted in a 57% decline in the net reproductive rate, a 1.45-fold decrease in birth rate, a 1.5-fold decrease in the intrinsic rate of increase, a 6-day increase in generation time, a 4-fold increase in death rate, and a 1.5-fold increase in doubling time. The stable age distribution (after 60 days) of D. pulex changed after exposure to fipronil. Increasing concentrations of fipronil resulted in a decrease in the percentage of individuals in the first, second, third, and fourth juvenile stages, an increase in the adult stage, and no change in the adolescent stage. These results indicate that certain concentrations of fipronil approaching the LC(50) can negatively affect population parameters of D. pulex, but that EECs, at least for fruit fly control, should be lower than the concentration necessary to cause damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.02.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor aqueous solubility of fipronil is likely the cause for deviations from linearity at high concentrations, rather than a slow and rate-limiting conformational change following binding.

    “It is likely that poor aqueous solubility of fipronil (Stark and Vargas, 2005) is the cause for this, rather than a slow and rate-limiting conformational change following the binding of the insecticide.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Stark, J. D., & Vargas, R. I.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Stark, John D.
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
11-16
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077493039
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
fipronil, Daphnia pulex, insecticide toxicity, hazard assessment, population growth rate, life tables, sublethal effects, net reproductive rate, NOEC, LOEC, generation time, intrinsic rate of increase
MeSH terms
Animals, Daphnia, Insecticides, Lethal Dose 50, Population Growth, Pyrazoles, Reproduction, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review