Cited by 250Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Heavy metals in food, house dust, and water from an e-waste recycling area in South China and the potential risk to human health

Zheng, Jing, Chen, Ke-hui, Yan, Xiao, Chen, She-Jun, Hu, Guo-Cheng, Peng, Xiao-Wu, Yuan, Jian-gang, Mai, Bi-Xian +1 more·2013·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Concentrations of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni) were measured in the foodstuffs, house dust, underground/drinking water, and soil from an electronic waste (e-waste) area in South China. Elevated concentrations of these potentially toxic metals were observed in the samples but not in drinking water. The health risks for metal exposure via food consumption, dust ingestion, and drinking water were evaluated for local residents. For the average residents in the e-waste area, the non-carcinogenic risks arise predominantly from rice (hazard index=3.3), vegetables (2.2), and house dust (1.9) for adults, while the risks for young children are dominated by house dust (15). Drinking water may provide a negligible contribution to risk. However, local residents who use groundwater as a water supply source are at high non-carcinogenic risk. The potential cancer risks from oral intake of Pb are 8×10(-5) and 3×10(-4) for average adults and children, and thus groundwater would have a great potential to induce cancer (5×10(-4) and 1×10(-3)) in a highly exposed population. The results also reveal that the risk from oral exposure is much higher than the risk from inhalation and dermal contact with house dust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.06.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, J., Chen, K.-H., Yan, X., Chen, S.-J., Hu, G.-C., Peng, X.-W., Yuan, J.-G., Mai, B.-X., & Yang, Z.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Ke-hui
  • Chen, She-Jun
  • Yang, Zhong-Yi
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
96
Pages
205-212
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015416457
Cited by
250
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation of China (41073078, 41230639)
  • Science &Technique Development of Guangdong Province (2010B080703035)
  • National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Industry Targeted Research (201309049)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
heavy metals, e-waste recycling, cadmium, lead, copper, zinc, nickel, food contamination, house dust, drinking water, groundwater, rice, vegetables, non-carcinogenic risk, cancer risk, children's exposure, human health risk assessment, South China
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, China, Dust, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Food Contamination, Humans, Oryza, Soil, Vegetables, Water, Water Supply, Risk Assessment, Metals, Heavy, Recycling, Electronic Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review