Cited by 105Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsRadioactive element chemistry and processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Encapsulating Fe3O4 into calcium alginate coated chitosan hydrochloride hydrogel beads for removal of Cu (II) and U (VI) from aqueous solutions

Yi, Xiaofeng, He, Jiarui, Guo, Yingyuan, Han, Zhenhua, Yang, Meixia, Jin, Jiali, Gu, Junjie, Ou, Minrui, Xu, Xiaoping·2018·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the removal of Cu (II) and U (VI) ions from aqueous solutions by encapsulating magnetic Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles into calcium alginate coated chitosan hydrochloride (CCM) hydrogel beads. ATR-FTIR and XRD analysis data indicated that the CCM composites were successfully prepared. SEM images and EDX spectra showed that Cu 2+ and UO 22+ ions were adhered onto sorbents. Adsorption properties for removal of both copper and uranium ions under various experimental conditions were investigated. Kinetic data and sorption equilibrium isotherms were also conducted in batch process. The sorption kinetic analysis revealed that sorption of Cu (II) and U (VI) followed the pseudo-second-order model well and exhibited 3-stage intraparticle diffusion model during the whole sorption process. Equilibrium data were best described by Langmuir model, and the CCM composite hydrogel beads showed the estimated maximum adsorption capacity 143.276mg/g and 392.692mg/g for Cu (II) and U (VI), respectively. The CCM adsorbent exhibited excellent reusability for five cycles use without significant changes in the adsorption capacity and structural stability. The results demonstrated that CCM can be an effective and promising sorbent for Cu (II) and U (VI) ions in wastewater.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 105

Metadata

Authors
Yi, X., He, J., Guo, Y., Han, Z., Yang, M., Jin, J., Gu, J., Ou, M., & Xu, X.
Affiliations
Fuzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yi, Xiaofeng
  • Xu, Xiaoping
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
147
Pages
699-707
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754701845
Cited by
105
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
copper removal, uranium removal, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, calcium alginate, chitosan hydrochloride, hydrogel beads, adsorption, heavy metal removal from water, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Langmuir isotherm, adsorbent reusability, wastewater treatment
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Alginates, Copper, Hexuronic Acids, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ions, Kinetics, Models, Theoretical, Solutions, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Uranium Compounds, Water Purification, Hydrogels, Glucuronic Acid, Chitosan, Magnetite Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review