Cited by 40Air Quality and Health ImpactsHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Metabolomics analysis explores the rescue to neurobehavioral disorder induced by maternal PM2.5 exposure in mice

Cui, Jian, Fu, You, Lu, Runze, Bi, Yuan, Zhang, Li, Zhang, Chengcheng, Aschner, Michael, Li, Xiaobo +1 more·2019·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Reproductive epidemiological studies have suggested associations between perinatal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and adverse birth outcomes. To explore the effects of early prenatal exposure to PM 2.5 on subsequent generations, pregnant mice were exposed to PM 2.5 or filtered clean air in whole body dynamic exposure chambers for 14 consecutive days from gestation day (GD) 1.5 to GD15.5. Neurobehavioral tests showed that spontaneous locomotion and exploratory behaviors in the offspring were significantly enhanced in the open field test. Meanwhile, metabolomics analysis suggested activation of dopamine pathway while inhibition of glycine pathway in murine brains. Administration of the DRD4 antagonist, clozapine; or supplementation of glycine receptor agonist, taurine, to mice offspring attenuated the locomotor hyperactivities to levels indistinguishable from controls. These data provide strong evidence that maternal exposure to air pollution might increase the risk for neural disorders in the offspring during critical periods of brain development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.037

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cui, J., Fu, Y., Lu, R., Bi, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, C., Aschner, M., Li, X., & Chen, R.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Xiaobo
  • Chen, Rui
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
169
Pages
687-695
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902879941
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES020852, R01 ES07331, R01 ES10563)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0211600, 2017YFC0211603)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730088, 91743112, 91643109)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
PM2.5, air pollution, prenatal exposure, maternal exposure, neurobehavioral disorders, locomotor hyperactivity, dopaminergic pathways, DRD4, clozapine, taurine, glycine receptor, brain development, offspring, perinatal exposure
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Maternal Exposure, Mice, Particulate Matter, Metabolomics, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review