Cited by 12Air Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Outdoor fine particulate matter exposure and telomere length in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wei, Bincai, Zhou, Yawen, Li, Qian, Zhen, Shihan, Wu, Qingyao, Xiao, Zhiyi, Liao, Jian, Zhu, Bin +3 more·2024·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Although the association between changes in human telomere length (TL) and ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been documented, there remains disagreement among the related literature. Our study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to investigate the health effects of outdoor PM2.5 exposure on human TL after a thorough database search. To quantify the overall effect estimates of TL changes associated with every 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure, we focused on two main topics, which were outdoor long-term exposure and prenatal exposure of PM2.5. Additionally, we included a summary of short-term PM2.5 exposure and its impact on TL due to limited data availability. Our qualitative analysis included 20 studies with 483,600 participants. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant association between outdoor PM2.5 exposure and shorter human TL, with pooled impact estimates (β) of −0.12 (95% CI: −0.20, −0.03, I2= 95.4%) for general long-term exposure and −0.07 (95% CI: −0.15, 0.00, I2= 74.3%) for prenatal exposure. In conclusion, our findings suggest that outdoor PM2.5 exposure may contribute to TL shortening, and noteworthy associations were observed in specific subgroups, suggesting the impact of various research variables. Larger, high-quality studies using standardized methodologies are necessary to strengthen these conclusions further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116206

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, B., Zhou, Y., Li, Q., Zhen, S., Wu, Q., Xiao, Z., Liao, J., Zhu, B., Duan, J., Yang, X., & Liang, F.
Affiliations
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Xueli
  • Liang, Fengchao
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
275
Pages
116206
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393075180
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
PM2.5, air pollution exposure, long-term outdoor exposure, prenatal exposure, short-term exposure, telomere shortening, air pollution health effects
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Telomere, Maternal Exposure, Particulate Matter, Telomere Shortening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review