The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces
Abstract
Recognizing the complex inter-correlation between FDI, emission and the three economic determinants of emission, we constructed a simultaneous model to study the FDI-emission nexus in China by exploring both the dynamic recursive FDI entry decision and the linkage from FDI entry to final emission results under the intermediation of the scale, composition and technique effects. The model is then estimated on the panel data of China's 29 provinces' industrial SO2 emission. Result shows that, exerting through different channels; the total impact of FDI on industrial SO2 emission is very small. With 1% increase in FDI capital stock, industrial SO2 emission will increase by 0.099%, in which the emission increase caused by impact of FDI on economic growth and composition transformation cancels out the emission reduction result due to FDI's role in reinforcement of environmental regulation. By introducing to the simultaneous system the recursive dynamism that supposes FDI entry decision to depend on last period's economic growth and environmental regulation stringency, our model also provides convincing supportive evidences for ‘Pollution haven' hypothesis. Although FDI enterprises in China generally produce with higher pollution efficiency, the rise in environmental regulation stringency still has modest deterrent effect on FDI capital inflow. Furthermore, the composition transformation impact of FDI in China seems to be dominated by the inflow of foreign capital pursuing a ‘production platform' that provides lower pollution regulation compliance cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions?
Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1031 · Cited by 2,850
Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M. (1966) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1909771 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Qin, Q. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122149 · Cited by 452
Research on influencing factors of environmental pollution in China: A spatial econometric analysis
Liu, K., & Lin, B. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.194 · Cited by 325
Sreenu, N. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19597-x · Cited by 62
Liu, W., Shen, J., & Wei, Y. D. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116501 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- He, J.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 228-245
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2261633949
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.008
- The paper
- He, J. (2006). Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.