Cited by 1,005Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data in the Estimation of a Dynamic Model: The Demand for Natural Gas

Balestra, Pietro, Nerlove, Marc·1966·Econometrica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1909771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1966-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
585
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985419506
Cited by
1,005
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 23
FWCI
38.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
dynamic demand model, natural gas demand, demand estimation, econometric estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review