Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa

Turpie, J.K., Marais, C., Blignaut, J.N.·2008·Ecological Economics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ashton, 2002, Avoiding conflicts over Africa's water resources, Ambio, 31, 236, 10.1579/0044-7447-31.3.236 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baskin, 1996, Curbing undesirable invaders, BioScience, 46, 732, 10.2307/1312847 · doi:10.2307/1312847
  3. Blignaut, 2007, Determining a charge for invasive alien plant species (IAPs) to augment water supply in South Africa, Water SA, 33, 27
  4. Cowling, 2003, A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot: the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, Biological Conservation, 112, 191, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00425-1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cullis, 2007, A strategic study of the impact of invasive alien plants in the high rainfall catchments and riparian zones of South Africa on total surface water yield, Water SA, 33, 35
  6. Görgens, 2004, Invasive alien plants and water resources in South Africa: current understanding, predictive ability and research challenges, South African Journal of Science, 100, 27
  7. Hobbs, 2004, The Working for Water Programme in South Africa: The science behind the success, Diversity & Distributions, 10, 501, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00115.x · doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00115.x
  8. Le Maitre, 1996, Invasive plants and water resources in the Western Cape Province, South Africa: modelling the consequences of a lack of management, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 161, 10.2307/2405025 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Le Maitre, 2000, The impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment, Water SA, 26, 397
  10. Macdonald, 2004, Recent research on alien plant invasions and their management in South Africa: a review of the Inaugural Research Symposium of the Working for Water Programme, South African Journal of Science, 100, 21
  11. Marais, 2004, The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress, South African Journal of Science, 100, 97
  12. Milton, 2003, Economic incentives for restoring natural capital in southern African rangelands, Frontiers of Ecology and Environment, 1, 247, 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0247:EIFRNC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. Myers, 1990, The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspot analysis, The Environmentalist, 10, 243, 10.1007/BF02239720 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rouget, 2004, South African National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment 2004: Technical Report. vol. 1
  15. Scott, 1997, Preliminary empirical models to predict reductions in total and low flows resulting from afforestation, Water SA, 23, 187
  16. Smakhtin, 2001, Unconventional water supply options in South Africa: possible solutions or intractable problems?, Water International, 26, 314, 10.1080/02508060108686924 · doi:10.1080/02508060108686924
  17. Turpie, 2003, The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: How interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay, Ecological Economics, 46, 199, 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00122-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Turpie, 2003, Economic value of terrestrial and marine biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region: implications for defining effective and socially optimal conservation strategies, Biological Conservation, 112, 233, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00398-1 · DOI
  19. Turpie, 2007, The ecological and economic consequences of changing land use in the southern Drakensberg grasslands, South Africa, Southern African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10, 423
  20. Van Wilgen, 2001, The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 3, 145, 10.1023/A:1011668417953 · DOI
  21. Zunckel, 2003, Managing and conserving Southern African grasslands with high endemism, Mountain Research and Development, 23, 113, 10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0113:MACSAG]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0113:macsag]2.0.co;2

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Turpie, J. K., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. N.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
788-798
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120493904
Cited by
394
References
0
FWCI
24.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024
The paper
Turpie, J. K., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. N. (2008). The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.