The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
(2007) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 9,690
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 · Cited by 5,079
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Governing the commons — the evolution of institutions for collective action
Weede, E. (1992) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90034-e · Cited by 3,919
Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00161-2 · Cited by 2,908
Rural development : putting the last first
Chambers, R. (1983) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 2,895
Cited by
Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly
Coria, J., & Calfucura, E. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.024 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Clements, T., John, A., Nielsen, K., An, D., Tan, S., & Milner-Gulland, E. J.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1283-1291
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044875015
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010
- The paper
- Clements, T., John, A., Nielsen, K., An, D., Tan, S., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2010). Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
