Cited by 4,209Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementSustainable Development and Environmental Management

The Struggle to Govern the Commons

Dietz, Thomas, Ostrom, Elinor, Stern, Paul C.·2003·Science

Abstract

Human institutions—ways of organizing activities—affect the resilience of the environment. Locally evolved institutional arrangements governed by stable communities and buffered from outside forces have sustained resources successfully for centuries, although they often fail when rapid change occurs. Ideal conditions for governance are increasingly rare. Critical problems, such as transboundary pollution, tropical deforestation, and climate change, are at larger scales and involve nonlocal influences. Promising strategies for addressing these problems include dialogue among interested parties, officials, and scientists; complex, redundant, and layered institutions; a mix of institutional types; and designs that facilitate experimentation, learning, and change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1091015

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • So long as conflicts do not escalate to a point where the governance system becomes dysfunctional, they can bring about learning and change as different interests, philosophies, and perspectives are aired in the process of deliberation and conflict resolution.

    “So long as conflicts do not escalate to a point where the governance system becomes dysfunctional, they can bring about learning and change as different interests, philosophies, and perspectives are aired in the process of deliberation and conflict resolution (Dietz et al., 2003).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Dietz et al., 2003

  • Conflict resolution may be as important a reason for designing resource governance institutions as concern over a resource.

    “as Dietz et al. (2003) note, conflict resolution may be as important a reason for designing resource governance institutions as concern over a resource.”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Dietz et al., 2003

  • Learning is promoted by deliberation.

    “It is promoted by deliberation, including '[w]ell-structured dialogue involving scientists, resource users, and interested publics, and informed by analysis of key information and environmental and human environment systems' (Dietz et al., 2003, p. 1910).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Dietz et al., 2003

  • Catastrophic resource collapses have resulted when central governments exerted sole authority over resources.

    “Dietz et al. (2003) note in this regard that catastrophic resource collapses have resulted when central governments exerted sole authority over resources.”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Dietz et al. (2003)

  • Such participation can build trust among disparate governance actors to encourage cooperation and stimulate institutional innovation to deal with challenging natural resource concerns.

    “Such participation can build trust among disparate governance actors to encourage cooperation and stimulate institutional innovation to deal with challenging natural resource concerns (see Dietz et al., 2003).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Dietz et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C.
Affiliations
  • National Academy of Sciences (US)
  • Environmental Science and Policy Program and Departments of Sociology and Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Corresponding author
Stern, Paul C.
Venue
Science
Published
2003-12-12
Volume
302
Issue
5652
Pages
1907-1912
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2165702945
Cited by
4,209
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 173 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 280 · 2018: 223 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 212 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 255 · 2013: 204 · 2012: 225
FWCI
73.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
Keywords
commons governance, environmental institutions, institutional resilience, transboundary pollution, tropical deforestation, climate change, institutional complexity, multi-stakeholder dialogue, institutional experimentation, environmental change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review