Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Public acceptance of PCT schemes is primarily shaped by factors such as policy design, perceived fairness, and environmental effectiveness.
“Existing studies have shown that public acceptance of PCT schemes is primarily shaped by factors such as policy design, perceived fairness, and environmental effectiveness [8].”
From The power of loss: message framing, climate anxiety, and engagement in personal carbon trading (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making carbon pricing work for citizens
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Distributional effects of carbon taxation
Wang, Q., Hubacek, K., Feng, K., Wei, Y.-M., & Liang, Q.-M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.083 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Fang, G., Tian, L., Fu, M., Sun, M., Du, R., & Liu, M. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.041 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Unequal emissions - unequal policy impacts: how do different areas of CO2 emissions compare?
Büchs, M., Bardsley, N., & Schnepf, S. V. (2014) · International Handbook on Social Policy and the Environment · doi:10.4337/9780857936134.00008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The power of loss: message framing, climate anxiety, and engagement in personal carbon trading
Li, T., Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Zeng, S. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03713-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bristow, Abigail L.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1824-1837
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033854919
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.lboro.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Keywords
- personal carbon trading, carbon tax, public acceptance, stated preference, climate policy, carbon emission reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
