The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is conceptual vagueness an asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
How science makes environmental controversies worse
Sarewitz, D. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,194
Cited by
Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services
Wunder, S. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016 · Cited by 832
A leverage points perspective on sustainability
Fischer, J., & Riechers, M. (2019) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.13 · Cited by 361
A Critical Review of Scales Used in Resilience Research
Salisu, I., & Hashim, N. (2017) · IOSR Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.9790/487x-1904032333 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Strunz, S.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 112-118
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082865867
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is conceptual vagueness an asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.012
- The paper
- Strunz, S. (2012). Is conceptual vagueness an asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
