Cited by 100Resilience and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

A Critical Review of Scales Used in Resilience Research

Salisu, Isyaku, Hashim, Norashida·2017·IOSR Journal of Business and Management

Abstract

This paper reviewed some of the most commonly used measures of resilience.Among these measures, four of them were found to be used more frequently than others and therefore discussed.These are Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC 10), Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).The scales were presented in tables.After critical examination, CD-RISC and CD-RISC 10 scales were found to be the most dominant scales in assessing resilience as they possess best psychometric properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9790/487x-1904032333

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have assessed both proximal and distal effects of resilience training, but the scales used do not distinguish between state and trait in their assessment.

    “While many studies have assessed both proximal and distal effects of resilience training, the scales used do not distinguish between state and trait in their assessment (Salisu & Hashim, 2017).”

    From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Salisu & Hashim, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salisu, I., & Hashim, N.
Affiliations
Universiti Utara Malaysia (MY)
Venue
IOSR Journal of Business and Management
Publisher
IOSR Journals
Published
2017-04
Volume
19
Issue
04
Pages
23-33
ISSN
  • 2278-487X (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-7668
OpenAlex
W2607769670
Cited by
100
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IOSR Journal of Business and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
resilience, Resilience Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, CD-RISC-10, Resilience Scale for Adults, Brief Resilience Scale, psychometric properties, scale comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review