The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy
Open accessAbstract
There is growing interest in the roles of the sharing economy and grassroots innovation in the transition to sustainable societies. Grassroots innovation research has tended to assume a sharp distinction between grassroots organisations and businesses within niches of socio-technical innovation. However, the non-profit sector literature identifies a tendency for non-profit organisations to actually become more commercially-oriented over time. Seeking to account for this tendency, we develop a conceptual model of the dynamics of grassroots organisations within socio-technical niches. Using a case study of Freegle, a grassroots organisation within the sharing economy niche, we apply the conceptual model to illustrate the causes, processes and outcomes of grassroots niche organisations becoming more commercially-oriented. We show that a grassroots organisation may be subject to coercive and indirect (isomorphic) pressures to become more commercially-oriented and highlight the ambiguities of this dynamic. Furthermore, we highlight that global niche actors may exert coercive pressures that limit the enactment and propagation of the practices and values of grassroots organisations. We conclude by highlighting the need for further research exploring the desirability and feasibility of protecting grassroots organisations from pressures to become more commercially-oriented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Cited by
The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?
Martin, C. J. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027 · Cited by 1,327
Self-citationSharing economy: A review and agenda for future research
Cheng, M. (2016) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003 · Cited by 888
Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling
Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.035 · Cited by 432
Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review
Hossain, M. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470 · Cited by 367
When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies
Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Budd, L.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 240-251
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1200059844
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.001
- The paper
- Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Budd, L. (2015). Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.