Lost in transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
de Jesus and Mendonça (2018), in a review of policy documents and academic literature, identified technological and financial factors as the main pressing barriers to CE implementation.
“In contrast, de Jesus and Mendonça (2018), in a review of policy documents and academic literature, identify technological and financial factors as the main pressing barriers.”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as de Jesus and Mendonça (2018)
The categorization of influencing factors partially aligns with the findings and classification of barriers to CE from de Jesus and Mendonça (2018) and Kirchherr et al. (2018), with additional factors related to environmental effects.
“This categorization partially aligns with the findings and classification of barriers to CE from de Jesus and Mendonça (2018) and Kirchherr et al. (2018), as we identified some additional factors related to environmental effects.”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as de Jesus and Mendonça (2018)
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365 · see citing works
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536 · see citing works
Nye, J. S. (1990) · Foreign Policy · doi:10.2307/1148580 · Cited by 2,170 · see citing works
Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · Cited by 1,903 · see citing works
At the Nexus of Blockchain Technology, the Circular Economy, and Product Deletion
Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9081712 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading?
Jarre, M., Petit-Boix, A., Priefer, C., Meyer, R., & Leipold, S. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“In contrast, de Jesus and Mendonça (2018), in a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017 Received 15 August 2018; Received in revised form 6 December 2018; Accepted 29 January 2019 ⁎ Corresponding author.”
InfluentialPasqualotto, C., & De Menezes, D. C. (2023) · Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · doi:10.7769/gesec.v14i11.3034 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S.
- Affiliations
- Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 145
- Pages
- 75-89
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2752517197
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 139 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 89.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (SFRH/BD/52295/2013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- circular economy, green innovation, drivers and barriers, innovation systems, transformative innovation, sustainability transitions, policy design, organizational strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review