Cited by 1,903Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Industrial Ecology

Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)

Open access
Kirchherr, Julian, Piscicelli, Laura, Bour, Ruben, Kostense-Smit, Erica, Muller, Jennifer, Huibrechtse-Truijens, Anne, Hekkert, Marko·2018·Ecological Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These potential technical barriers appear to remain under-appreciated in current political and stakeholder debates on the CE.

    “Notably, these potential technical barriers appear to remain under-appreciated in current political and stakeholder debates on the CE (Kirchherr et al., 2018;Leipold and Petit-Boix, 2018).”

    From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirchherr et al., 2018

    Section 4.5 (Implications; page unavailable) says current governmental CE strategies focus on overcoming technological barriers, rather than under-appreciating them. Section 4.4 (Technological Barriers; page unavailable) reports that the surveyed stakeholders did not rank technical barriers among the most pressing barriers. The paper's point is that technical barriers receive substantial attention despite appearing less pressing than cultural barriers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with circular economy.

    “A common major finding in this literature is that companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with CE”

    From Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 4.1 identifies hesitant company culture as a major barrier, supporting the point about companies’ willingness to engage with CE. But its finding about lacking interest and awareness concerns consumers, not companies. Section 4.2 reports high upfront investment costs while saying funding is available and limited funding ranks only tenth, so a general lack of company resources overstates the finding. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Companies often perceive circular economy strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability.

    “and that they often perceive CE strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability [11,14,15].”
  • For a PSS to contribute to a circular economy, it must be an attractive business for companies so that it actually gets implemented.

    “The first is that a PSS, or other circular measure, must be an attractive business for companies so that it actually gets implemented [11][12][13]”
  • Financial barriers are only one set of barriers to a company implementing circular measures or strategies.

    “Financial barriers, although crucial, are only one set of barriers to a company implementing circular measures or strategies [11,15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Amenta, E., Ramsey, K., 2010. Institutional theory. In: The Handbook of Politics: State and Civil Society in Global Perspective. Springer, New York, United States.
  2. Dholakia, N., Turcan, R., 2014. Towards a Meta-Theory of Economic Bubbles: Socio- Political and Cultural Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Repo, P., Anttonen, M., 2017. Emerging consumer perspectives on circular economy. In: The 13th Nordic Environmental Social Science Conference HopefulNESS, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317596538_Emerging_consumer_ perspectives_on_circular_economy.
  4. Stahel, W.R., 1981. Jobs for Tomorrow: The Potential for Substituting Manpower for Energy. Vantage Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Deloitte (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kirchherr, Julian
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
150
Pages
264-272
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799571143
Cited by
1,903
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 302 · 2025: 278 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 285 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 9
FWCI
186.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, barriers to circular economy, cultural barriers, consumer awareness, organizational culture, market barriers, state intervention, European Union, policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review